User talk:S&W Sciences

Anti-Doping Research
A tag has been placed on Anti-Doping Research, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Anti-Doping Research and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Yourname (talk) 22:38, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Don Catlin, external links
Hi S&W Sciences, are you in any way affiliated or connected with Don Catlin, the company Anti-Doping Research (ADR), Banned Substances Control Group (BSCG) or the Anti-Doping Sciences Institute (ADSI)? If that is the case, please note our Conflict of interest guidelines and be aware that Wikipedia is not a free advertising space, have a look at FAQ/Organizations (especially the section "May I advertise my organization or its campaigns, products, services or leading individuals on Wikipedia?").

Please also have a look at teh external link guidelines. In several articles, you added links to the homepages of these organizations even though they contain no information about that article's subject. (If a site contains a subpage with relevant information, use a deep link.)

Regards, HaeB (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

additional promotionalism
Additionally, you added an entire section on Dr. Catlin to one of the general articles on doping and sports. That was indefensibly extensive over-emphasis, and has been removed. Additionally, see the notice below:  DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  DGG ( talk ) 00:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)