User talk:Søbibörr

February 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lawrence Durrell has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lawrence Durrell was changed by Søbibörr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959882 on 2019-02-28T21:20:43+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cotton candy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Date, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Date was changed by Søbibörr (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960296 on 2019-02-28T21:34:06+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Energizer Bunny. Shellwood (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 21:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. PhilKnight (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)