User talk:S.alb94

File permission problem with File:Alqi Bllako in March 2021.png
Thanks for uploading File:Alqi Bllako in March 2021.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Alqi Bllako for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alqi Bllako is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alqi Bllako until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 12:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

FYI
Matters as such are best discussed on-wiki because there’s nothing private about them, the problem with the article is outlined in my nom rationale see here. Celestina007 (talk) 13:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Dallëndyshe Bici tagged for deletion
Hello S.alb94, I wanted to let you know that I've tagged Dallëndyshe Bici for deletion because the article is too promotional for an encyclopedia. The article also doesn't clearly show how the subject is notable enough for an enyclopedia (see WP:GNG). If you feel that this assessment is incorrect, you can either edit the article to remove the promotional parts or you can click on the " Contest this deletion " button and explain it on the talk page, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi S.alb, writing a new article from scratch is quite difficult. We summarize what reliable secondary sources say. See Writing better articles for some hints about article structure. The introductory sentence has to mention what the subject is notable for. The article on Arben Pëllumbi is also too promotional. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arben Pëllumbi


A tag has been placed on Arben Pëllumbi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ... disco spinster   talk  20:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alqi Bllako
Hello, S.alb94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alqi Bllako, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)