User talk:S.lopiano

Revert
Could you explain why you reverted this ? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Sure,

the category was not appropriate, i.e. MuSIASEM is *not* an economic methodology in the strict sense. Rather, flagging it out as an "heterodox approach" is far more suitable.

Cheers, S.lopiano (talk) 19:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Sam

March 2021
Hi S.lopiano! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Paul-Marie Boulanger that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Andrea Saltelli
You are mentioned at Teahouse. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, S.lopiano. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add Edit COI to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 00:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)