User talk:S10787091

August 2014
Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Who discography because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 (talk) 03:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Who discography, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 01:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

The Who
The Who is up for a peer review here. Please have a look. A number of longstanding editors have looked at the article carefully and fixed many faults. All content is currently verifiable to reliable sources, so please don't add any unsourced content as it is likely to be challenged and reverted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  07:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Who discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Seeker (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Won't Get Fooled Again, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:38, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

The Who
I'm sorry to say that all your recent edits to The Who have had to be reverted.

Are you having difficulty using the Wikipedia interface or do you need help with locating information so it is verifiable? You may find the teahouse can offer assistance. As it is, the article is being worked on to be a future featured article candidate, so adding unsourced edits with no edit summary are highly likely to be reverted. Please respond here or on the article's talk page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  08:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of number-one singles in Australia during the 1970s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squeeze Box. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Who. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lenny Kravitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Green Day discography. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 20:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Stop vandalising pages with fake sales figures. Or go buy a million copies of a CD to get its numbers to what you want. Noreplyhaha (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)