User talk:S1tongYang/sandbox

Peer Review
Hi! This is a nice start.

Pros:

Provides new information that is not covered in the original article.

Uses a variety of sources.

Sources look to be reliable sources as well.

Very detailed, but also does a great job of getting to the main point.

What to work on:

Adding photos would make the article much stronger.

The article has a few run-on sentences. Check on some spelling and grammar mistakes.

The addition of different sections would be very useful. It would help organize the material. Ex: History, Theo Van Doesburg, etc.

Additional information about each of the three artist?

--AaronAspelund (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello :) I am interested to learn more about your topic, it seems very interesting. You already provide a variety of sources and your writing is clear. I think that in addition to adding photos, it would be beneficial to the reader if you added internal links to some of the concepts you mention. For example, "elementarism" and "neo-plastic style orthogonal composition" are some things that not common knowledge and adding reference links for them allows people to get additional information and context to what your article is referring to. Good luck! Olivia.bakken (talk) 22:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)