User talk:S3286866

Welcome!
Hello, S3286866, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  02:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cardinal Knox Centre
I received your email. I prefer to talk "on-wiki" so everyone else can see. I did not give your article a full review, it will be up to the reviewing editor to decide if the references are sufficient to show that the building is notable. Winning a highly-publicized award is sometimes - but not always - enough to meet notability requirements, which is why I suggested giving some reliable source that indicated that the award was a major, highly-publicized award. If the award is not all that highly publicized, you will need more references about the building. All references should be from places that give the building significant coverage (vs. just a mere mention or "pro-forma" coverage), be from sources independent of the subject (i.e. independent of the award and the award-granting organization for proving the award is notable, or independent of the building and those affiliated with it or its construction for proving the building is notable).

I took a glance at your article and I have some other concerns about the images. While nobody will challenge you if you say "I took such-and-such a photograph" if the photo could literally be taken by anyone with a camera, when it comes to architectural drawings you may face some challenges. I will take you at your word that Commons:File:Cardinal Knox Centre, Melbourne Sight Diagram.jpg was not only done by you but that it is not a near-copy of someone else's work (which would make it a derivative work, not "your own work"). I'm assuming the same for Commons:File:City of Melbourne, Cardinal Knox Centre Site, April 2013.jpg. You may want to "watchlist" both images and set your Wikimedia Commons user settings so you will get an email if someone edits those files, such as by tagging them for possibly having a mis-labeled license. In any case, it's not all that common that we have contributors with the skill and tools to make such drawings of existing buildings, so thank you for going to the trouble to make them and contribute them to the world. The pictures are nice too. If by some chance any of these images or drawings are not 100% your own work, please help the Wikimedia Commons comply with its legal obligations and request that they be removed from the Commons unless and until everyone with a "copyright interest" in them signs off on licensing them under a Commons-compatible license. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  02:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Cardinal Knox Centre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! j⚛e deckertalk 02:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.