User talk:SADEGHILEILA

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Triwbe (talk) 16:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  Triwbe (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The tags on the Leila Sadeghi identify problems with the article, so other editors can assist in fixing them:
 * The article is, because it does not cite any independent reliable sources. The only link provided is to the author's web site.
 * The article is an apparent, based on your username. By definition, you cannot remove this tag; it can only be removed when other editors have reviewed the article and deem it to be sufficiently independent.
 * Finally, there is no clear assertion of of the subject. Again, independent sources would help. The tag is there because the article does not indicate any awards she has won, etc. This tag means I have a question of whether she is notable; if I'd already determined she wasn't notable, I would have already deleted the article.
 * We're working to improve the article. Please assist us by leaving these tags in place so other editors can help improve the article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Stop. Please explain why you think the tags should be removed from the Leila Sadeghi article before you remove them again. —C.Fred (talk) 16:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Flagging Leila Sadeghi for further review
Hello, … I recently encountered the article about Leila Sadeghi and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging  for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that other editors may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now  — Triwbe (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Triwbe (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Triwbe (talk) 07:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)