User talk:SAFNF/sandbox

SAFNF, I think all of this content will benefit the article and keep it moving along. I wasn't sure how you intended on including the first three "paragraphs" of your edits, but they seem to work together fairly well. They definitely introduce some important concepts of the topic.

Your writing itself is great. I could see where you changed things from the original to have a more active voice. I noticed one place, in talking about models where you could keep the active voice going. Maybe "researchers use these models to interpret..." You also maintained the position that much of what we know comes from research and evidence. In your sentence: "enhanced rates of photosynthesis in plants due to CO2 fertilization do not directly enhance all plant growth." I think this position is lost a bit. Maybe add "evidence shows" or something like that.

I think it is important that you're tackling more overview and broader implications of this idea. Together, our edits will make good additions to the article!

AK wong Alaska Wong (talk) 16:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)