User talk:SALoyd

Welcome!

Hello, SALoyd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

"there has been evidence to back that assertion up, just opinion"
Please read WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY. This was clearly a personal comment by you (and I presume you meant 'no evidence') and thus does not belong in the article. Please read WP:VERIFY carefully as I am not sure at all that you understand how Wikipedia works. Which isn't surprising or bad in any way as you are new, but given your edits I think you will benefit by reading some of our policies and guidelines to save you from the frustration of having your edits reverted. Dougweller (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Greetings
I was impressed by your greeting on your user page, but don't let that snow ya' I'm generally disagreeable. Yes, there is much misinformation here at Wikipedia, esp on the Thomas Jefferson page. This page has been subject to a long history of manipulations, to say the least. Just wanted to say hello and thanks for showing an interest and for your time and effort. Voices are needed. Many have shied away from revolving door debates. Need people who can go the distance. On the Jefferson page there remain only a few. On the upside, much progress has been made on the Jefferson page over the last year. Welcome. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 07:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I have noticed that on the Jeeferson page and the Democratic-Republican page has been changed for the better over the last couple of years. I have been meaning to join to help clear up misinformation that I see.  It is a great resource to use even with the misinformation as long as you use it as a starting platform to look for more information.  I am not known to shy away from debates, so we will see.--SALoyd (talk) 12:01, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback. Just a quick tip on talk page editing. Notice the way paragraphs are progressively indented here in this section. This is done by adding colon(s) ( : ) at the beginning of the paragraph when you are typing text in 'edit mode'. The first paragraph in a section gets no colon, the second paragraph gets one colon, causing it to indent, and the following paragraphs get two, three ... colons causing it to indent even further.

Once paragraph text becomes too far indented we start over using none, one, two, colons as was done with this paragraph. Other editing features include bold text and text in italics. Just look at the text here in 'edit mode' to see how this is done. Much else can be learned about editing by simply observing other editors. Once again, welcome. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 18:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Gwillhickers for your input on the discussion on Jefferson political affiliation, it was to no avail though. Are they always so closeminded to new information that contradicts their "widely known" incorrect information.  I guess I will just have to fight my battle on the Democratic-Republican Party article discussion page to dispel the myth that the afore mentioned Party was the same as the Republican Party.  I just thought it would be easier to change Jefferson's political party when you have proof instead of just heresay.  I have had more productive discussions with children.--SALoyd (talk) 01:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)