User talk:SARFRAZ MANGRAL

Welcome

 * Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

link to page
I see that you have adding links to www.mangral.com on the external links and references section of several sections. That goes against Wikipedia's guideline on external links, and you risk getting considered a spammer. Please link instead to a specific page inside the site containing info about the subject of the article. For example, in Mirpur District I tried to find a specific page using google, but I could only find pages that mentioned the district in passing, so I have removed the link completely.

I now have to go to sleep, so I can't look at the rest of your link additions. For now, I suggest that you go to places like Mangral and that you add specific pages there as references. For example, see my addition here

Please be careful not to use as sources any page that you had originally copied from Wikipedia, as wikipedia articles can't be used as sources on articles. --Enric Naval (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Mangral
I am concerned that the coincidence between your username and a source that you have "sort of" cited recently at Mangral may mean that you are inserting content that you have created yourself off-wiki and that this may be a version of original research. Please can you provide full details of the source that you mentioned. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm 4twenty42o. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mangral because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 4twenty42o (talk) 03:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm MatthewVanitas. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mangral, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi


The article Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The subject’s sons and grandson were notable but no evidence he was himself."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 23:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fateh Muhammad Khan Karelvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)