User talk:SAWSSEN B

MEDRS
Hi SAWSSEN B, I'm Boghog. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles such as Allopregnanolone without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Reliable sources. Boghog (talk) 10:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Boghog, Thank you for your message. But I wanted to tell you that the information that I added are from reliable source from 3 articles. Here are the references that I use it :
 * 1. Balan I, Patterson R, Boero G, Krohn H, Buckley T, Meltzer-Brody S et al. (Mar 2023). "Brexanolone therapeutics in post-partum depression involves inhibition of systemic inflammatory pathways". eBioMedicine. 89: 104473.
 * 2. Shad MU (Apr 2023). "Recent Developments in Pharmacotherapy of Depression: Bench to Bedside". J. Pers. Med. 13(5): 773.
 * 3. Salwan A, Maroney M et al. (Dec 2022). "Patient-reported perceptions of brexanolone in the treatment of postpartum depression: A qualitative analysis". Ment Health Clin. 12(6): 342–349.
 * Thank you for your help.
 * Best regards,
 * Sawssen 160.114.107.204 (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Sawssen. Thanks for your reply. Of the three sources that you refer to above, the first and third are WP:PRIMARY (not MEDRS compliant) while the second is WP:SECONDARY (MEDRS compliant).  A astonishing high percentage of biomedical research cannot be repeated (see replication crisis). Hence per WP:MEDRS, secondary sources are generally required to suport medical claims. The second paragraph that you added is probably OK, but you should focus the conclusions of the review and not directly mention the author or the paper in the text of the article.  The citation should be sufficient. Thanks. Boghog (talk) 13:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)