User talk:SBJulie

Speedy deletion nomination of Stonebranch


A tag has been placed on Stonebranch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
I would advise you to read WP:COI, as to judge from your username you have a close connection to the subject in question. I've given the CSD notification to you as well as to the original author as you appear to be the one tasked with its maintenance at present. Please also read WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. Peridon (talk) 21:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)