User talk:SBaylor/sandbox

Will M's Peer Review
Literature8 (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that your added lead section is a good overview and roadmap of your article. This follows Wikipedia's criteria well.
 * Does this lead section follow the sections in your article? Are they in order?
 * Do you need any new sources? The lead section is just an overview so maybe not. Any other areas in the article?
 * I think a good portion of your work will be editing the structure of the article. You did a nice job of this above!

Article Content Draft Peer Review by Maria Jensen
-I am not sure if this is necessary for the lead section, but I would add a reference to each sentence.

-Great job with adding to the lead section while keeping it concise and short.

-Wikipedia suggests that the lead section contain no more than 4 paragraphs, but I believe what you have written is perfectly fine. However, if you would like to add more content that is within Wikipedia's lead section guidelines, that is fine, too.

Mjensen32 (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)