User talk:SCPROJNAME

Nazism and Fascism are two distinct ideologies, though both are oriented toward totalitarianism. Nazism, however, is not any kind, type, or form of Fascism. Fascism originated fundamentally in the trenches of World War I; it stresses militarism, not unexpectedly. A fascist State is the ideological end product, the final conclusion, of the ideology.

With Nazism, the ideological end product was supposed to be when the Leader completely replaced the State as a totality. This is, in fact, empirically proven as when, e. g., Hitler forced the German Army to swear the Fuehrer Oath. Loyalty was then pledged absolutely not to any German-Nazi State; the oath was directly given to only Hitler as the Supreme Leader. (I've written about the many differences pertaining to these evil ideologies and posted non-Wikipedia articles online.)

Equally, there is no true, universal, or undisputed consensus that Nazism was on the ideological Right. Leo Strauss and many other scholars had identified, for example, Nazism as a product of Liberalism, in the sense of being on the Left. I hope there will be more needed study given to these imoportant matters. Hitler hated reactionaries; he, for instance, greatly hated the Hapsburgs; he had ordered, toward the end of World War II, the killing of all the Lipensauner horses because of this thoroughly great hatred. The Nazi Party rally song, in addition, mentioned explicitly that the Right and the Left are to be rejected as false ways to go. Nazism claimed, ultimately, to be the middle way by rejecting both of them.

Yours sincerely, SCPROJNAME (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)