User talk:SDJenkinson

December 2010
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself, as you did at Chapman's Protection Agency. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. matt (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Removal of *Most Rev Dr Sir John E Chapman from RSD page
I have removed Most Rev John Chapman from the page Royal School Dungannon.

If you want to reinstate him, link to the CPA that he was involved with (instead of the generic CPA page. Link to any Wikipedia article about him, or any external page referencing him.  His extraordinary list of academic qualifications make his entry extremely dubious.

Trenwith (talk) 16:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chapman's Protection Agency


A tag has been placed on Chapman's Protection Agency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)