User talk:SDSonline

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company, organization, or clients. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Alexf(talk) 12:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: :While you may see your own site as a useful resource, you have missed one important fact (and you are not the first). This is not American Wikipedia - it's a worldwide Wikipedia in English. Creating a page for your site is unlikely to be a true worldwide view of the available data. This is why the chemical suppliers (e.g Alfa Aesar, Aldrich) always ask for one's country before allowing an MSDS to be viewed - because there are (and probably always will be) some national variations, even with GHS - REACH will tend to fatten up EU MSDs in time to come. In addition the supplier's do not restrict their viewing of MSDSs to 5 free ones, they are all free - thus adding your site would also bring an advertising component - as I assume after the 5 free ones, that one has to pay.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hi Ron - Thanks for your comment. I agree that this is a worldwide Wikipedia, not an American Wikipedia - furthermore, I am aware of the differences between the hazard communication standards of various countries. I don't agree with all of your points but appreciate the respectful way in which you've shared your point of view. I stand by my original contention that we have many free resources on our website that anyone interested in MSDSs would find useful - regardless of their country of origin. Furthermore, if the issue is advertising, with a lowercase a - then I think that covers just about everyone with an external link on the page. Not trying to quibble - just saying - five free MSDS look ups in one of the largest online databases is sufficiently valuable for the thousands of companies and individuals that take advantage of our offer. All of that said, it's a moot point. I will leave it to others to share our resources on Wikipedia, and I will restrict my offerings to those areas outside of my expertise (small joke). Thanks and kind regards, bjharbaughSDSonline (talk) 21:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I was called in, as the blocking admin to make a comment. I have no issues with the name change (the new name). I still have the same issues with the COI, as the user politely explains that he is intending to keep talking about his industry and his company. I recuse myself as I already have voiced my opinion by blocking in the first place and leave it to the reviewing admin to decide. As stated, I have no issue with the new chosen name. The user should read the Business FAQ before proceeding though to fully understand the issue from Wikipedia's point of view. -- Alexf(talk) 23:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Alex...Thank you for weighing back in. Just to clarify, I said in my first post "...as I understand it, since I work for the company I'm not actually allowed to link to it." And in my second post that I would "leave it to others to share our resources online and I would restrict myself to topics outside my expertise." The last part of the second line was a small joke - For instance, I assume there would be no conflict of interest if I were to create a page about butterflies, or add valuable content to pages dedicated to mimes. Both of which I know little about. But I might come across an interesting fact on mimes and add a citation somewhere. Who knows. bjharbaughSDSonline (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I have read the Business FAQ and will have no trouble following its prescribed course of actions going forward. Thank you. bjharbaugSDSonline (talk) 16:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)