User talk:SE962582C

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Badagnani, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Mechanical digger (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Syrthiss (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Are you aware of exactly how unlikely it is that some user just registered, mastered some of our guidelines and in their first edit found the page of a banned editor and blanked it? Just saying. Syrthiss (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Please explain your connection to, as indicated by this edit here. –MuZemike 23:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * SIR, — As to the question of "Whose ["sock"] am I", if that is indeed the "question", I cannot possibly admit or "own up" to something that I am not. (or, otherwise, if it is not, then, if I may ask, Sir, what is the real and true question? What is the question?) I am of and based in a certain part of the United Kingdom, albeit not always, and that is that. I am also un-employed, and am not currently of any school, college, of further, higher or adult education, or University. I must re-state that I do consent to be contacted in other ways, if that would aid in the clearing up of this rather unfortunate and sorry affair. Se962582c (talk) 16:47, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Nevertheless, I must also add that whilst I must confess and admit, that whilst I would never be able to FULLY understand or comprehend as to what I had been "blocked" for, I do nevertheless undertake that I shall cease and desist from activities that might be seen or deemed as "damage" or "disruption", as well as to make contributions instead that are deemed useful. Se962582c (talk) 17:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I did NOT realise that the two were two separate accounts. How was I suppose to know that the two were? That is all I can say. user:SE962582C vs. user:Se962582c. A proper computer nerd with six eyes would had known and spotted that, but I am not, so how would I? SE962582C (talk) 21:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * So you're saying that you found yourself able to edit other pages using Se962582c, and you did edit other pages with it (while SE962582C was blocked from editing), but you did not realise that that was block evasion? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Plus you went through the entire account creation process a second time and didn't notice? Favonian (talk) 21:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * (By the way, there's no need to copy your comments to me by email - I'll see them here just fine. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC))
 * Well, some [of us] are not as clever or smart as you might care (like) to think! I certainly cannot do programming or [code-breaking, or penetrating into other systems, et cetera]! (And I am certainly not very aware of "case sensitivity"; neither were most outside of Wikipedia/Wikimedia) I am also partially-sighted (Retinitis pigmentosa), if you must know. That is to say, I am also disabled.
 * Perhaps I can request (ask) for a little courtesy, discretion and accommodation, or leeway (unless you were in fact comfortable with being, well, "not very nice", to a person who cannot in fact see properly). To me, UNTIL it was pointed out to me, the "two" to me WERE the same account. Anyhow, I am certainly not going to be as smart or as clever as a Danish-born Computer engineer in the United States!
 * I, a blocked user after all (Remember?), thought that it was quite impossible too, and was quite surprised, but there you go! Like I said, my dear friends, and gentlemen, I am in fact a simple and slightly middle-aged disabled man not in very good health, well, mate! (Perhaps you, gentlemen, would care to venture to propose and suggest that I should not had been editing Wikipedia solely upon the account that (merely because) I am partially-sighted.) SE962582C (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi. Nobody is criticizing any visual impairment you might have, and this is not actually about any failure to distinguish between upper and lower case letters. The point is that the second account, regardless of the similarity of its name, *could not even exist* without your going through the account creation process a second time and creating a second account - and that isn't really something that can come about by a typographical error or an inability to see letters properly. The fact is that you, or somebody else, created the Se962582c (lower case) account at 12:04 on 4 February 2012, while your SE962582C (upper case) account was blocked. That can only be a conscious act, and cannot happen just by typing the letters incorrectly when you log in - if you type your login wrong, all that will happen is you will fail to log in, and it will not create a new account.
 * I also note that you have emailed me a copy of your message again, which I have already told you is not necessary. I do note that you added extra information regarding your personal identity, but I would caution against that - it makes no difference at all to your unblock request, and it's not generally considered a good idea to share such details with strangers on the Internet.
 * Anyway, I've said all I want to say, so feel free to post another unblock request if you wish, and another admin will review it in the light of all of this discussion. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I suppose not, perhaps not to Scousers, Merseysiders or other persons with a connection to Liverpool, anyway!
 * Well, what happened was, that I THOUGHT that my (old) account was deleted (with a message in red, "does not exist"), only for, AFTER the account was created, somehow, that the Talk page for my (old) account to re-appear. I STILL THOUGHT that I was using the SAME account, UNTIL the Great Dane caused me to be informed (told me) of otherwise.
 * The other account could hardly had been a "sock", if I DID NOT even KNOW that the two were even separate accounts. User:Reaper_Eternal certainly did not think so, initially.
 * Be that as it may, I am still a disabled man. Perhaps I may be treated a little differently, or at least with a little compassion, kindness and understanding, than an otherwise fit and healthy person under the age of fifty years.
 * Given that most administrators are largely based in the United States of America, what damage could the otherwise "strangers" possibly do? I most certainly am not a coward; and I have very little in my disposal to lose anyhow. I am certainly not a fancy computer engineer or programmer, with lots of fantastic career prospects ahead, for I am only a humble man who is out of luck, in real life. SE962582C (talk) 18:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)