User talk:SEAsheke

July 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Renton, Washington, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 21:10, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, SEAsheke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Renton, Washington did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. John from Idegon (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Southport on Lake Washington


A tag has been placed on Southport on Lake Washington, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  21:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, and thank you for your note. Gilo1969 proposed that the page be deleted as advertising (he notified you immediately after making the proposal), so I want you to know that it wasn't just my idea.  Here are some of the issues that led to me to consider Gilo correct:
 * Near the beginning of the page is a paragraph seemingly aimed at travellers (whether potential residents who need to travel frequently, or visitors considering a hotel at Southport), which comprises one sentence talking about its proximity to nearby airports, one sentence talking about the driving time to nearby highways, and one sentence talking about residential and hotel options.
 * Not far below, we're told that the hotel on site is award-winning.
 * "SECO Founder Michael Christ first spotted the site from his boat on Lake Washington where he would watch sunsets and admir the mountains and Seattle skyline."
 * In the background section, the site's 100-gigabits-per-second Internet connection is noted
 * The project's significance is touted through means like specifying the demolition contractor's history ("carried out by the same firm that handled the Kingdome demolition"), noting things that apply to all developments ("The Southport project required...an environmental impact statement"), and providing really precise details about individual buildings ("Two apartment buildings totaling 383 units")
 * Put together, all of these factors made the article look a lot like a real-estate salesman's brochure, and unfortunately, we get tons of advertisements for anything and everything, so our standards are really strict in this area. I can help you put together an encyclopedia article about the development, if you'd like, but we'll have to do things quite differently.  Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, I'm sorry I forgot to reply sooner. For this kind of topic, some of the best sources are governmental: can you find resources from King County or the city of Renton that provide detailed coverage of the development?  We're going to need primarily text coverage that goes beyond raw data; something like a map or a GIS database won't be particularly useful.  A bunch of the sources you cited in the first version of the article will be useful, and I'll paste them here; I just wanted to see if you could find more than news media before we go farther.  Also, either here or my talk page is a good place to respond, so if you hadn't said anything yet, I'd say to respond at either place.  But since you've made one reply at my talk page, best to keep replying there, so your responses are easy to follow and don't get scattered among pages.  Nyttend (talk) 02:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)