User talk:SERGIO GAUCI

Rodrigues solitaire
Hi, please take part in the following discussion, the image has inaccurate colours and is severely pixelated: FunkMonk (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, SERGIO GAUCI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. The information you deleted/edited out of Boléro was from a verified source. It reported a statement from a book by an authority on the subject of Sufism, and presented it as the author's statement, not as an incontrovertible fact. Your removal of it imposes your point of view on Wikipedia—which is contrary to all of the project's guidelines and purposes

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tapered (talk) 03:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

how can i publish my own page for everybody to see like as other info on Wikipedia ?
Please help me with...

SERGIO GAUCI (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The page WP:Your first article describes how to write an article. I would also suggest reading through our WP:AUTOBIO warning page. If you are ready to write, use the Article wizard to do so. If you want more help, change the help me-helped back into a help me, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC) ..will you let me contribute ...YES OR NO ?

wish to know more : about how i can contribute by visual and written knowledge via my professional expertise
Thanks for your help & reply ...but I have another question, please. I am a professional sculptor and illustrator. I did works about various subjects like ; mythology, Art and Religion ... and I wish to  contribute visually to Wikipedia pages.

SERGIO GAUCI (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have created works that would improve Wikipedia's articles, the best course of action is to upload them to Wikimedia Commons, which is the Wikimedia image repository for free images. Your Wikipedia login will also work on Commons. Note that any work you upload will need to be released under a free licence, allowing other people to freely reuse it for any purpose, including commercially. Yunshui 雲 水 07:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

MY CONTRIBUTION ON WIKI STOPS HERE .... MY WORK IS BEING REMOVED WITH NO REASON OR NOTABLE FACTS TO PROVE THE REMOVAL .... THIS IS A BIG WASTE OF KNOWLEDGE AND TIME.

January 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cygnus falconeri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC) THIS IS THE MAIN REASON INFORMED IN THE SUBJECT PEOPLE ARE REFUSING TO CONTRIBUTE TO WIKI ...WY THE HELL DID I HAVE MY RESEARCH WHICH IS 100 PER CENT MY OWN WORK A THESIS I HAVE BEEN WORKING ON REMOVED ! AM SO FED UP NOW ... AM OUT OF WIKI ,.,,TO CONTRIBUTE ON OTHER SITES ... THIS PLAT FORM IS NOT RESEARCH FRIENDLY AND NOT SERIOUS ...EVERY BODY CAN EDIT EVEN HIPSTERS BUT NOT ACADEMICS ...THIS IS A HEAD ACHE !!! LAST NIGHT IT TOOK 4 HOURS TO PUT MY WORK SAFE ...THEN WIKI REMOVED IT ..WHY ? IT IS A YEARS OLD THESIS  //// ABOUT MY LOCAL FAUNA ... AM I WELCOMED OR NOT !? IF NOT TELL ME AND I WILL QUITE WASTING MY TIME. AM A TALENTED HUMAN BEING NOT A ROBOT //// FACEBOOK IS A MILLION TIMES BETTER THAN WIKI ....
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cygnus falconeri was changed by SERGIO GAUCI (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909034 on 2019-01-27T16:51:49+00:00

Original research
You might want to read about Wikipedia's no original research policy. You may not use Wikipedia to publish your own original research. This policy keeps individual editors from using Wikipedia to promote their own personal point of view at the expense of published research. That doesn't mean that your contributions are not appropriate, it just means that if it's your own work, you have a conflict of interest and should limit yourself to summarizing the published research of others.

And the Ku Klux Klan is indeed a hate group. Don't remove that.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)