User talk:SEscience

February 2024
Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, the link existed already. I only want to update the page by replacing "Axivion Bauhaus Suite" by "Axivion Suite". Its name has changed. By mistake I have actually used the wrong syntax for the link. The original link Axivion Bauhaus Suite should have been Axivion Suite. I was about to fix that when you reverted to an older version. However, all entries regarding the Axivion Suite have been lost now. These need to added again. SEscience (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It existed in error - there is no standalone article, so it never should have been there in the first place. A redirect to a research group isn't sufficient. Kindly do not put it back. MrOllie (talk) 14:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't see how this link differs from those of the other links in the table as, for instance, the one to ConQAT. And it's not just a research group. It's about the Bauhaus project, which is a collaboration of different organizations and how this evolved into availble static-analysis tools.
 * And why should that be a reason to remove all mentioning of the Axivion Suite altogether? SEscience (talk) 14:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The link differs because ConQAT has an article about the software and Axivion does not. Axivion should be removed because it does not meet the inclusion criteria for the list - which is having a prexisting, dedicated Wikipedia article. MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I see. So adding a page similar to ConQAT would solve the issue? SEscience (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If the required sources to support an article exist, yes. See WP:AFC for how you'd go about doing that. And on the chance that you are associated with this software, see WP:COI and WP:PAID, Wikipedia's terms of use would require certain mandatory disclosures in that case. MrOllie (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, many thanks for the clarification. Will do. SEscience (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)