User talk:SFCTID

Welcome!
Hello, SFCTID, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Muntazah Oryx Investments, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dog six (talk) 03:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Muntazah Oryx Investments


A tag has been placed on Muntazah Oryx Investments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 03:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Muntazah Oryx Investments for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muntazah Oryx Investments is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Muntazah Oryx Investments until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dog six (talk) 04:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Multiple Accounts
I've blocked Parisfarmer as being a Sockpuppet of you. Please do not use multiple accounts like this. If you continue to do so you will likely be blocked. Thank you for your cooperation. NativeForeigner Talk 19:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Javed Only Lives Once
Hello SFCTID,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Javed Only Lives Once for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sourov0000 (talk) 10:28, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kerry Lambos


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kerry Lambos, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hack (talk) 05:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Keating Government
Hi, I've just reverted your move of the Keating Government article to Premiership of Paul Keating. The common way of referring to different governments in Australia is to refer to them as the Keating Government, Howard Government, Gillard Government, etc. If you'd like to discuss what the Wikipedia articles on these topics should be called, please start a central discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian politics‎. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Agreed - SFCTID, could you please revert other altered articles accordingly. In Australia the term premiership is more commonly associated with state governments. Ozhistory (talk)

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Cathy McGowan (politician). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. '' Also Please also make sure to add a reliable source that verifies her previous political stance, and whom she worked for.'' — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 10:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Cathy McGowan (politician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. StAnselm (talk) 21:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Moving Australian soccer league system
That is a change that requires discussion. I have reverted it.

There have been several RfCs at Talk:Soccer in Australia, all reaching a consensus that "soccer" is the name for articles about the game within Australia.

Please join discussions at that page if you want. HiLo48 (talk) 07:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your edit at A-League
There is a repeatedly achieved consensus at Talk:Soccer in Australia that the name "soccer" will be used for Australian articles.

Can you also please use Edit summaries and post on the article's Talk page when you want to make changes. HiLo48 (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Move of Barramundi
Please note that there is no source that supports your move. This is not a word of Latin origin. Noting that you appear new to Wikipedia, please note that such bold actions may need to be tempered by discussion. I encourage you to state your rationale and supporting references on the talk page. Till that happens, it would be best to retain the status quo that has lasted. Shyamal (talk) 08:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wee Waa, you may be blocked from editing. Messages about "resisting the lizard people" and invalid redirections undermine the hard work put in by many editors. Gronk Oz (talk) 14:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:HiLo48. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:HiLo48. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sepp Blatter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 10:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 10:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)