User talk:SGGH/Archive 2011/January

Thank you!
Thanks so much for putting up an article about Lena Ingelsrudøya. I came over to see if she already had a page or not and noticed that you had beat me to it. Thanks for putting up the stub. I'll see if I can add more to it in the next few days. Ragnhild16 (talk)
 * Welcome, S.G.(GH) ping! 19:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle misfire
Hi SGGH, for some reason when you nominated Malik Mumtaz Qadri for deletion, an AfD template wasn't added to the article. I think I've fixed it now, but just thought I'd drop you a note to let you know. SmartSE (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Opps, sorry about that. Cheers S.G.(GH) ping! 14:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk Fusion
I´m planning to write an article regarding this company and I have no idea what they wrote here before, but I saw that you deleted the page. May I ask why? Is there anything what I should know before I get going with this article? All the best, --UgroSzarvas (talk) 19:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll have a look. S.G.(GH) ping! 22:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for showing me the earlier "article". Well, not a masterpiece to say the least. I will upload today what I wrote, please take a look on it when you got some time. Thanks. --UgroSzarvas (talk) 10:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kaulzaarriaga.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kaulzaarriaga.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 23:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * As before, too long ago to know now. Sorry. S.G.(GH) ping! 13:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposal
Hey, on my David Wood article, i want a revote because the votes started when it was still a stub making it unfair. I have since added reliable sources making the initial objections null.Someone65 (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Review
Hey, i have just cleaned up the David Wood (Christian apologist) which you voted for deletion. Do you still maintain your original position? Someone65 (talk) 03:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed to neutral. S.G.(GH) ping! 10:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Lihaas
I did try some mediation with Lihaas on his talk page and mine. It might be best for the warring parties just to find other articles on which to edit, for a while, until tempers cool. Then some mentoring might be helpful as well as discussion, perhaps sometimes by private email. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 14:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, some of these users wear their colours on their sleeves. S.G.(GH) ping! 15:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, come on. His move to RFC (citing 9 month material that admin HJ Mitchell said is moot) and ANI was clearly unwarranted and vengeance seeking. (in response to an Arbcom in him where he warned he was readying create a complaint on me because heaven forbid i fight abck his diktats and a wikiquette alert tat Arbcom said to try other avenues first) Im also discussion matter on the talk page instead of warring as ltcb2412 suggested at the RFC. Im not attacking on the talk page either (was only heated at the noticeboard complaint), instead calling for conent discussion repeatedly and accomodating OTHER editors who ask for RFCa nd move to new sections to clear clutter. (another editor created yet another section that im contributing constructively too.
 * Also note please: "Also note his vengeance mongering stems from the conflict that started over the 2011 page with 2 other complaints and now he resorts to an ancient 2010 page that shows no dispute resolution" How can he not get at least some sanction for false reporting in order to "solely to harass or subdue an adversary" per already explicit rules that had to see to submit an RFC Requests_for_comment
 * How do I get attacked/blamed for HIS mistakes? Seeing both Arbcom AND wikiquette, how many editors seem to have probs with him before his attack on me (which is also an NPA as seen in the RFC)(Lihaas (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)).
 * I wasn't talking about you. S.G.(GH) ping! 13:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)