User talk:SHF Wiki

Welcome!

Hello, SHF Wiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Boundary 2 have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:20, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Boundary 2
Your edits here are starting to border on vandalism (or have already crossed that line). You continuously: 1/ remove a valid reference added by DGG (to Ulrichsweb); 2/ restore formatting errors(underscores in file name, "citeweb" instead of "cite web", "1980's" instead of "1980s"); 3/ replace an "emdash" with a dash; 4/ insist on using an incorrect term for peer review ("refereed"; please note that members of an editorial board are considered "peers"); 5/ add an obscure phrase about article selection being "not rooted in a particular field or discipline." This is obviously untrue, as the journal clearly indicates on its website what kind of material it covers. Please stop making these edits or I will report you for vandalism. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:06, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi friend,

Thanks a lot for the feedback Mr Wiki. Why dont you take care of all the formatting stuff since you seem to have a LOT of free time on your hands.

The journal is NOT discipline based. I invite you to read an issue or a years' run. Peers = field based. For example, your peers might be your colleagues in software or McDonalds or whatever it is that you do when not here-- you area of expertise.

Please stop acting like you are in charge of WP and acting like a stubborn child, or I will have to report you to Steve Jobs.

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/SHF Wiki for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Guillaume2303 (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive757
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillaume2303 (talk • contribs)

Boundary 2 talk page
Hi,

Some other people have take up similar comments as the ones you made on the b2 page... and the same editor (who is probably the publication's editor) has swiftly censored them. Just wanted to pass the info if you hadn't been to the page lately.

This is the gyst of it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boundary_2&oldid=500422226

Compare that to what the talk page looks like now

95.241.252.9 (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

By the way, look at how User Bove and Guiallame's edits appear. The same person?