User talk:SIJOPTG2

June 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — 🦊 08:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Let's voluntarily not talk and let an admin review my unblock. SIJOPTG2 (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry for the distruption I caused this morning. Please ask a CheckUser or Arb to contact me if you want to know who is behInd this and why? SIJOPTG2 (talk) 12:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC) SIJOPTG2 (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * does not review unblock requests. You've been told how to appeal your block (describe how you want to participate in building this encyclopedia) and pinging multiple administrators without answering is more likely cause additional disruption. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:04, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Please can you ask a CU or Arb to get in touch. I think you should read the above. SIJOPTG2 (talk) 13:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You are free to make another actual unblock request. CheckUsers don't typically get involved unless there is a need to, which there doesn't seem to be at this moment.  Your unblock request is for explaining your situation.  If for some reason you must give private information in your request, you may use WP:UTRS to request unblock. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As you guessed, I am a sock of someone. I want to come clean but only to a CU/Arb. I will not be unblocked. SIJOPTG2 (talk) 13:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you want to communicate with ArbCom, you should send an email per Arbitration Committee. This doesn't really call for a checkuser, as they don't need to use their powers if you are admitting to being a sock. 331dot (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * And yes, I had already run a checkuser on you for the blatant socking. bordering on ✅. Stop playing games. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)