User talk:SJ610710

March 2019
Hello SJ610710. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Hexaware Technologies, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SJ610710. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GermanJoe (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello GermanJoe, I am not being paid for any of my edits. The information that I added was missing from the web page. While doing the edit I also mentioned the right source to verify my edits. It is not a paid edit from my side.


 * Hello, aside from the possible conflict of interest or paid editing, the detailed product listing was inappropriate anyway. Wikipedia doesn't host comprehensive product catalogues (see WP:NOTDIRECTORY). Specific noteworthy products can be mentioned in prose, but such information must be based on independent non-promotional 3rd-party sources, not on the company's own website or PR videos. Such self-sourced promotional content will be removed. If you have further questions, please feel free to ask at WP:Teahouse. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)