User talk:SJB689

2002 Rugby League State of Origin series
Nice work on the article. May I suggest you add some more content, similar to 2007 Rugby League State of Origin series? Happy editing, Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Wests Tigers Representatives
A template has been added to the article Wests Tigers Representatives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. NeilN 20:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Rugby League Season Pages
Hey I appreciate your work on the season pages. However, can I suggest that you add WikiProject Rugby league to your watchlist. A recent discussion took place on the talk page and we've decided to not put those new Grand Final scorecards up for the reasons listed there. As for the dashes in the scorelines, could you use the " – " coding (click edit this section to see the code) with no spaces instead of "-". Greatly appreciated. If you have any further questions please feel free to do so on the project's talk page. Cheers, mdmanser 05:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you please confirm that you got this message? One of the guys in the project will being to remove those new boxes anytime soon - so don't worry about making any more because they are going to be phased out. mdmanser 09:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Penrith Panthers History
A tag has been placed on Penrith Panthers History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. скоморохъ ѧ 05:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

There their there
There's a difference between "there" and "their" and your edits are consistently wrong in the usage you employ eg "There" might be a new club record in 2008 if the Roosters beat "their" previous highest points tally.- Sticks  66  12:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:2008 Super 14 Table
Hi! Please be more careful when updating Template:2008 Super 14 Table as you did here.


 * Crusaders got a bonus point for scoring 4+ tries and thus went to 10 points
 * You didn't update the Reds' games played from 1 to 2
 * I don't know why you were changing the team links but Sharks (rugby union franchise), Bulls (rugby league franchise) and Cheeters (rugby union franchise) are all incorrect.

Cheers! --Stormie (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of New Zealand Warriors History
A tag has been placed on New Zealand Warriors History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &lt;3 bunny  00:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of History of the St. George Illawarra Dragons
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article History of the St. George Illawarra Dragons, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * All issues below (needs copyediting, needs expanding, needs expert attention, not of neutral point of view, too short in length, and unreferenced), Is perfectly acceptable on St. George Illawarra Dragons article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.    The Windler      talk   07:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)