User talk:SK. Nihal

September 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rakul Preet Singh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Diffs: You need to read the Template:Infobox person instructions so you are not erroneously using parameters like father and mother, which are used when there are notable parents, i.e. ones with existing articles that have endured community scrutiny. As for the photo caption, nobody cares what she wrote on her Instagram page, in photo captions, we provide basic details about who is depicted and when it was taken.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

I am sorry for my disruptive editing. Please unlock my account for editing. Please unblock me. I will promise that I won't repeat mistakes in editing again. Please forgive me and unblock my account. Please.... SK. Nihal (talk) 03:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Template instructions and ridiculous caption
Re: these changes], I've already tried to educate you about proper usage of the Template:Infobox person parameter. Please also see parents, which still wants notable parents, and see also relatives in case you think you can misuse that parameter as well. Don't submit unsourced or poorly sourced content like you did with her height, and if you submit a ridiculous caption like "Rakul shows her inner beauty" again, or misuse our various Infobox parameters again, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. You have demonstrated that not only are you not willing to adhere to community guidelines, like basic infobox rules, you also have made some highly questionable choices including editorial content and other problematic content in captions. Example here where you don't seem to understand the purpose of a caption (hint: it usually explains when the photo was taken and where they were), or here where you are lavishing praise over her "beautiful image" and here, where I guess you're drooling over the subject's cleavage through the tear in her shirt? Not appropriate, and since you don't seem to understand this, and also don't seem receptive to the education you've been provided, I have to interrupt your editing privileges to prevent damage to the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)