User talk:SK SPPU55

Your addition to the Vitamin B12 article
Hello SK SPPU55. I have reverted your addition to Vitamin B12, which added a citation to the "See also"" section, namely 10.3390/antiox11051026. I fail to see how that publication is relevant to the vitamin and a "See also" section should not contain references, since it merely lists additional Wikipedia articles which an interested reader of the main article may wish to consult. If you are in any way connected with the authors of the Antioxidants publication you have a conflict of interest and need to read carefully Wikipedia's policy on this (as I have linked). Meanwhile, I shall review your other contributions to ensure you have not added inappropriate material elsewhere. Mike Turnbull (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Mike Turnbull, I wonder how a person in the Department of Zoology can have an expertise in diabetes among humans. I have serious doubts about that journal too, given this., are you familiar with this outfit? Drmies (talk) 13:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * MDPI is not a predatory publisher, but only barely so. It's a "bottom feeder", although some of their journals have decent impact factors. I'd be careful using any publication from them at face value. As for the department, I once knew a guy in a dept of dentistry doing mouse behavior genetics (and very interesting stuff at that). People sometimes have to take whatever is offered to them. I guess this doesn't help much... :-) --Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Reliable sourcing of medical claims
SK SPPU55. You must read and abide by Wikipedia's policy on sourcing for medical claims, which are outlined at WP:MEDRS. I am not the only one to have noticed that many, if not all, of your additions have failed to meet these requirements. You may be blocked from making further edits if you do not abide by our policies. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)