User talk:SL93/Archive 9

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Willsome429. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2018 PowerShares QQQ 300, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 23:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The VelociPastor
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Report on the Party and the Guests.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A Report on the Party and the Guests.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Liparis liliifolia
valereee (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Julie Dretzin
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Litsy
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

DYK for Betty Flint
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello ,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. There are now holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action. Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays. Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox. Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards. Admin has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13. The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting the queue to 0
 * Coordinator
 * This month's refresher course
 * Tools
 * It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
 * It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
 * Reviewer Feedback
 * Second set of eyes
 * Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
 * Do be sure to have our talk page  on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
 * Arbitration Committee
 * Community Wish list

DYK for Adaora Adimora
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Zenas King
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Oecanthus fultoni
--valereee (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019


This year's Reviewer of the Year is. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
 * Reviewer of the Year

Special commendation again goes to who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to and  who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by.
 * Redirect autopatrol

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
 * Source Guide Discussion

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This month's refresher course

DYK for Mack Garner
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bella Jarrett
--valereee (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello ,

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
 * Source Guide Discussion

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
 * Redirects


 * Discussions and Resources
 * There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
 * A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
 * A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
 * A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
 * Refresher

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here 16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dustin Fitzsimons


The article Dustin Fitzsimons has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Only had a few minor roles. No major sourcing found at all."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Fate of Lee Khan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Fate of Lee Khan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Picks


The article Nick Picks has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Poorly verified list of non-notable DVDs containing selections of cartoons."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Nick Picks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Picks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nick Picks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hope Runs High
Hello! Your submission of Hope Runs High at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik (talk) 03:53, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Hope Runs High
SL93, the creator of the article has just shown up, and would like the nomination to proceed; unfortunately, they forgot to sign their post so their attempted ping to you didn't go through. Please stop by when you get the chance. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the message. I looked over the article and the creator got it almost ready to go. SL93 (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello ,

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference. In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
 * Your help can make a difference
 * Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
 * Discussions and Resources
 * A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
 * Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
 * A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
 * Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Chasing 3000
Hello! Your submission of Chasing 3000 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hog Farm (talk) 02:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hope Runs High
Hello! Your submission of Hope Runs High at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Hanging of Patrick O'Connor
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hook visuals
Hi SL93, thanks very much for pitching in and building prep sets! FYI I moved your Prep 5 down to Prep 6 because there were two people image hooks in a row. We try to vary the image hook among people/plants/buildings/paintings/graphs, etc.

It was recently brought to my attention that the look of the prep sets could be improved by staggering the way the bolded links appear. Instead of running one hook after another that has the bolded link at the beginning, we are trying to vary the placement of the bolded link for a more pleasing overall look—see for example Preps 1 and 4. It does take more time, I'll admit, and sometimes I'll promote hooks over 2 sets while I'm looking to achieve a nice staggered look, but I think it pays off in the end. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The bolded link placement seems more trouble than it's worth. I was just focusing on building a balanced set while trying to clear out old nominations. SL93 (talk) 14:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed. But it does look nicer. Yoninah (talk) 15:03, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I probably won't be doing preps if it is a new requirement. SL93 (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I gave what you said a go in prep 5. SL93 (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Wow, it looks great! Did it take longer than usual? Yoninah (talk) 09:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It look a bit longer than usual, but it's fine. SL93 (talk) 17:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I see you're working very hard to stagger the bolded links. I just want to mention that you can preview the set as you build it by clicking on the link under the edit window for the prep set you're working on. You might see that even if you run two hooks in a row with a bolded link in the beginning, a longish hook will also separate out the bolding nicely. Best, Yoninah (talk) 10:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I tend to mess things up when I do some things on Wikipedia all at once. For example, I tag articles that I want to expand with an in use tag so I can write the article in parts and section by section. SL93 (talk) 10:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Thanks for building sets! I just wanted to mention that I and other prep builders have been putting 3 bio hooks in each set instead of 4, since we seem to have less of them. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Joanna Cole (author)
Noticed all the good work you're doing at Joanna Cole (author). I have just nominated the article for inclusion at In the news/Candidates. You may want to at least support the nomination, and perhaps add further comments. HiLo48 (talk) 04:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I was annoyed that her article was almost total crap because I grew up with her Magic School House books and she lived in the same city as me (Sioux City, Iowa). SL93 (talk) 04:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I come from just a little further away, Australia. But even some of us foreigners have heard of The Magic School Bus. In my case it was as a teacher, where I made use of some of the video games. Very engaging for students. HiLo48 (talk) 05:20, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Mildred Hope Fisher Wood
Hi I've reviewed the hot off the press article at Template:Did you know nominations/Mildred Hope Fisher Wood and had some minor questions about it, please feel free to ping me when you've had time to look at it. Mujinga (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * How does the nomination look now? SL93 (talk) 16:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Chasing 3000
Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 00:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of A Piece of Eden
Hello! Your submission of A Piece of Eden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Agnes Samuelson
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maria Ovsiankina
Hello! Your submission of Maria Ovsiankina at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 11:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination of Helene Odilon
Hiya I've reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Helene Odilon and left some comments. All the best, Mujinga (talk) 14:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Molly Neptune Parker
Hello! Your submission of Molly Neptune Parker at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Hook interest
I don't really appreciate your comment on Template:Did you know nominations/Casilda Iturrizar. My interest has never been to advocate for my opinion but to get the best hook possible on the main page. I do appreciate your asking me to explain my objection so we can get a consensus. It does seem to me that these articles you've been nominating lately (Molly Neptune Parker and this) are rather sketchy and don't have much to work with to develop a good hook. Yoninah (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I honestly disagree with you on Casilda Iturrizar. SL93 (talk) 19:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I submitted a new hook that mentions two things that were named after her, as well as mentioning the street plaque that memorializes her. SL93 (talk) 19:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * From what I've seen at DYK for awhile, the best possible hook is always what matches your opinion. It's actually a really annoying common occurrence. Maybe it's because other editors don't have the guts to disagree with the person who promotes their hook. SL93 (talk) 20:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry to barge in, but this is simply not true. As someone who has disputed with Yoninah in the past, they turn out to be right about consensus more often than not. If you disagree with them, you can try what I did, bringing it up on WT:DYK for broader discussion. For me that was a humbling experience: Yoninah is a veteran, and pretty much understands Wikipedian consensus regarding what DYK hooks should look like. Of course they are human and make mistakes like all of us, but they've been doing this a lot longer than I have, that's for sure. I was sure they were wrong and other editors would see my side; in the end everyone who commented agreed with Yoninah. For what it's worth, I read hooks ALT3 and ALT3.1 and agree with Yoninah, there is a real hook interest problem here. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 23:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I was wrong about what I said and I apologized on Yoninah's talk page. As for the hook interest, we would really need to backtrack on hooks about things that are named after other things if we can definitely say such things can't be considered interesting. I don't feel like being the guinea pig for that. There have been a few times when others have claimed my hooks are not interesting and I'm glad that I stuck up for those hooks because they received enough views while on the main page. SL93 (talk) 23:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * For example, Template:Did you know nominations/Teshio River which is in a prep now and my hook Template:Did you know nominations/Agnes Samuelson which was on the main page recently. For the first DYK, most of the places in Hokkaido came from Ainu language. SL93 (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Alexander the Last
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for A Piece of Eden
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Special occasion hooks for August 14
Hi, there are two special occasion hooks for August 14. I don't think either needs a picture slot, but they should probably go into Prep 4. Best, Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Done. SL93 (talk) 00:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Prep 1
Hi, you have two death hooks in the same set. Also, execution by hanging isn't "quirky". Best, Yoninah (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The quirkiness is in its phrasing and not that it was an execution by hanging. Though I don’t care if it’s moved to another prep. Also, no one is going to be dumb enough to think that she came back to life. SL93 (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * SL93 (talk) 12:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Mildred Hope Fisher Wood
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Molly Neptune Parker
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Margaret Mercer
Hello! Your submission of Margaret Mercer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Joy Parr
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Sensing Changes
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Helene Odilon
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Maria Ovsiankina
—valereee (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Cabinet of Folksongs
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Symbolon
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Conte (literature)
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Margaret Mercer
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Future Leaders of Manitoba
An article created in February by a user blocked in March, with no evidence that the author was the sockpuppet of a user blocked at that time is not eligible for WP:G5. Cabayi (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I misread the policy and I undid my edit. SL93 (talk) 10:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I don't see any way forward except waiting for G13 in February. It may serve as a honey pot for other paid editors in the meantime. Cabayi (talk) 10:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Origins of the Hermit Brothers of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council
Hello! Your submission of Origins of the Hermit Brothers of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! MartinPoulter (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Prep 7
Hi, I appreciate your taking the time to build Prep 7. I'm happy you chose that lead hook and image. Did you notice that you have two U.S. hooks side by side, and two U.S. college hooks in the same set? Feel free to switch them out with other sets. Best, Yoninah (talk) 18:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm having difficulty with that so I will wait for a new prep to open up. SL93 (talk) 20:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I fixed it. SL93 (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Excellent! Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Ruth Robertson Berrey
—valereee (talk) 00:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Rejection of Draft: Wintershall Dea
Hi, SL93. You recently rejected Draft: Wintershall Dea by. While I fully agree that the draft lacked of independent reliable sources, there is no doubt about the notability of this subject as a broad media coverage of that subject exists. I expanded this draft (mainly translating the 'History* section from de:Wintershall Dea) and added additional references. I hope you will take a look of the re-submission. Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your work and message. I accepted the article. SL93 (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Set building
Hi, could you build a prep set? We're back to running two a day and no one else seems to be active. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I can. Interestingly, something went wrong with a hook I promoted. I'm not sure how to fix Template:Did you know nominations/Joaquín Bilbao and what went wrong. SL93 (talk) 18:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The coding got split in half. I fixed it. Yoninah (talk) 18:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I was going to build Prep 5, and left a note at Template:Did you know nominations/August 2020 Midwest derecho. But we must have edit-conflicted and you promoted it. Could you undo your promotion please? Yoninah (talk) 18:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I undid it. I apologize that I didn't know how to unpromote it without removing your comment. SL93 (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I have two more hooks to promote to prep 4, but I have to get ready for work now. SL93 (talk) 18:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I really appreciate your help. Do you want me to fill the last two hooks? Yoninah (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * That would be perfect. SL93 (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * My ride will be here soon, but I'm checking back to ask about Template:Did you know nominations/Elastomeric respirator. I thought that the article could still be promoted with clarification needed tags, but that may have been unacceptable. Would you be to double check my promotion? SL93 (talk) 19:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't promote it with those tags. Yoninah (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright. I unpromoted it and notified that nominator. Adding back to nomination page now. SL93 (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll also add back my comment on the nomination. Yoninah (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Origins of the Hermit Friars of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Great stuff! Thanks for all you did with this! Mccapra (talk) 04:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for another good one! - Every once in a while, I have a TFA, happy that it was also a tribute to Brian, in great collaboration, fine Main page, and see also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for another good one! - Every once in a while, I have a TFA, happy that it was also a tribute to Brian, in great collaboration, fine Main page, and see also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Bare-shanked screech owl
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Vlashnjë
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I looked at the note, but I’m not seeing the issue. It really is personal preference.SL93 (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * We will just have to disagree on this one. SL93 (talk) 16:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Night Patrol
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Roy James Carver
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Jewish views on lying
Hi, did you answer your question? ALT1 just moved the bolded link in the approved hook. Oh, I see you promoted it. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Request on 08:01:57, 9 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Schnoebi
I am disappointed and rather disheartened that you concluded that this article reads like an advertisement. This is not an advertisement. It describes a well established and internationally recognised educational charity that is encouraging the designing and making of medals. It works with art collages in the UK and overseas to encourage the craftsmanship of medal making (coin design); a tradition that spans over a 1000 years. It is supported by the British Museum. I could go on, but I am deflated... The article is informative and accurate.

If someone can assist me in restyling the article to read less like an advertisement, I would be very grateful. --Schnoebi (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * An article should not use promotional language such as "were instrumental", "internationally acclaimed", and "its aim". SL93 (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

--Schnoebi (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Ok. I will review. I have modified as follows:
 * "were instrumental" - the two people were instrumental in the formation of the society. This does not promote the society. I have replaced with the word "Key people"
 * "internationally acclaimed" - Yes, that is promotional. Sorry about that. I have changed to: "international"
 * "its aim", ambiguous and changed to "the project was designed to"

I could not find any more promotional language. Thank you SL93 for your input. Thank you again. Schnoebi

DYK for Matchstick Marvels Museum
—valereee (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Diguetia
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Request on 23:42:09, 12 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by JamesSerieDno4
Disagree with assessment.

I disagree with the assessment that the Draft:Radical Monopoly article does not have sufficient coverage, it deprives the community of the opportunity to develop the concept that has been cited in social science papers and re-shared around the internet for over 30 years, and predicted a concept that is more relevant in current culture than the original author could have predicted.

I made the changes the initial editor requested, and then it was declined for another unrelated reason. I've taken it as far as it needs to go, and this process seems shady.

JamesSerieDno4 (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * While you did include other papers, you didn't reference them correctly (look at the references section to see how it should be). There shouldn't be external links in the body of an article. If you reference the papers correctly, I will accept the draft. SL93 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I took care of it for you and I accepted the draft. SL93 (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot. KCVelaga (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Alex Anderson (quilter)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Laura Marholm
Hello! Your submission of Laura Marholm at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Leonhard Lechner
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jeanne Humbert
Hello! Your submission of Jeanne Humbert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The Spirit of Israel
Hey there, I dont understand why you declined the draft...i added more links but would love to better understand since The Spirit of Israel is a huge and importent non-profit organization in Israel and has been so for the past years. Please help me better understand and also fix what needed.. I also would like you to know that I submitted it only after I spend hours on the live chat and did eveything I was asked. When I finished 3 editors told me it is now "safe" to submit since it looks fine... Please help, thanks! --Shir2020 (talk) 09:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I noticed two aspects of what is typically advertising jargon - "with the aim of" and "aim to empower". I try to be extra careful for such language when there is a declared close connection to the subject. While it isn't required for approval, making sure that every statement is referenced would be a huge help if you felt like doing such a thing. SL93 (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Laura Marholm
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Claire Etcherelli
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Jeanne Humbert
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you SLN93 for your review of my article on Absolute Monarchs!! Truth is King TALK 14:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for James Barney Marsh
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Request on 12:03:13, 28 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Torresjrjr
I believe this article submission deserves to be accepted, not rejected.

I cite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(software)#Reliability_and_significance_of_sources

> Common sense and an awareness of historical context should be used in determining whether coverage in sources found for an app is in fact reliable and significant. Factors that may impact on the evaluation of sources include: > The way the app is distributed. It is reasonable to allow relatively informal sources for free and open-source software, if significance can be shown. For instance, Usenet posts may be acceptable sources for some guy's homebrewed Unix clone [refering to Linus' Linux].

Pleroma's notability is not temporary. Pleroma is Free and Open Source, which is important because it will hardly ever recieve a reference from an established news source since it isn't a product. It's notability stems from it's history and community. You could consider this an article regarding a community based on some software. Therefore, I believe the following citation is *not* applicable to this submission.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(software)#Promotion_and_scope

The Mastodon_(software) and PeerTube article are perfect examples of what the Pleroma article could and should be. Pleroma is arguably as notable as those two. It's certainly more notable than PeerTube in terms of numbers. I've written this article with the stub template, beacuse I think this submission is capable of expansion regarding newsworthy internet history.

Please reconsider this submission. Thank you for your time.

Torresjrjr (talk) 12:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Wahan Ke Log
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 19:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hargovinddas Kantawala
Hello! Your submission of Hargovinddas Kantawala at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik (talk) 04:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of One Piece Bounty Rush
Hello! Your submission of One Piece Bounty Rush at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Anna Langfus
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Need help reviewing Draft:Atif Afzal (music composer)
Hello, I have drafted this page - Draft:Atif Afzal (music composer) - adding neutral information per WP:NPV using WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS references. I have also worked on improving with the help of other community editors, as you can see in the page history. Requesting you for your kind review. Thanks.

--AAComposer (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 07:15:01, 8 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Whitebella
Hello, My article was reviewed and declined citing that article does not show significant coverage. If i am reading into this correctly should i be adding more links in citation from independent sources to get it approved? Thanks for your consideration. Whitebella (talk) 07:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That is part of it, but there also needs to be independent reliable significant coverage such as articles and reviews. SL93 (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Margueritte Harmon Bro
Hello! Your submission of Margueritte Harmon Bro at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Demon vs. the Satanic Power.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blue Demon vs. the Satanic Power.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Angela Haseltine Pozzi
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Hook promotions
Hi, the next time you promote hooks, could you promote some more of my nominations and hooks that I've written that I can't promote? The older ones are:
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Gloria Swanson (this would be good for the image slot in Prep 5)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Saracen's Head, London
 * Template:Did you know nominations/List of Arjuna award recipients (1961–1969)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Forbidden Area (Playhouse 90)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/The Caribbean Mystery
 * Template:Did you know nominations/List of Arjuna award recipients (2000–2009)
 * Template:Did you know nominations/New Romantics (song)
 * Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I sure can. I will work on promoting more tomorrow. SL93 (talk) 00:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I promoted two of the above nominations. I requested someone to promote Template:Did you know nominations/List of Arjuna award recipients (2000–2009) on the DYK talk page because I was the one who approved your alt. SL93 (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 10:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Sociology of Housework
Hello! Your submission of The Sociology of Housework at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Nan Wood Graham
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Prep 3
Hi, thanks for doing a set. You have 2 hooks by the same nominator, though. Please move one to another set, preferably a few sets down, as we have quite a few of these television play hooks.

There's also a DYK credit line missing. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I fixed it, but moving it a few sets down isn't possible with only one empty set. SL93 (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * OK. So I returned it to the Approved page for a later promotion. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright. Although I feel like such a thing isn't necessary when there will soon be more empty preps. SL93 (talk) 22:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, but this editor is nominating lots of 1950s American television play articles, with pretty much the same hook angle for each one (i.e. a quote praising the production). We need to space them out, just like we do the recent spate of Arjuna award articles. Yoninah (talk) 15:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for One Piece Bounty Rush
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Niu Yingzhen
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Sociology of Housework
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Hargovinddas Kantawala
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Prep 1: Bob Hindmarch
Hi, there was a lot of discussion (and, in my view, confusion) about the hook choice, but I think the one you chose is the most wordy and hard to parse. Any chance of replacing it with ALT2? Yoninah (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I will do that now. SL93 (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yoninah (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)