User talk:SLAviationLover

Replaceable fair use File:Sri Lankan Airbus at Gan airport.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sri Lankan Airbus at Gan airport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Sri Lankan Airbus at Gan airport.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

About edit war
There in Bandaranaike International Airport page, the Turkish Airlines Destinations have been given as Istanbul and Male. You always removing Male Velena International Airport from Turkish Airlines Destinations from Colombo. Turkish operates daily flight between colombo and male under flight number TK730-TK731. Do you hate CMB airport? Ref: https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/tk730 So why someone removing such content from a wiki page? Do you say that the above mentioned resources are false? Now I am going to reverse that again as Male is a Turkish Airlines Destinations from Colombo. Same for Travel Service Polska flight 3Z7630 from RKT to CMB.

Colombo
Firstly, the Smartwings Poland flights are technical stops, you cannot book a flight from Ras Al Khaimah to Colombo meaning it is definitely not notable in the table the table is for flights that can be booked through the airline website or a tour operator not technical stops. Same with Turkish Airlines you CANNOT book a seat on that flight on the airline website so it has no place in the table. JCC199 (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for a three-revert violation despite a warning and whatever this was. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:26, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Maheshi Madushanka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maheshi Madushanka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maheshi Madushanka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)