User talk:SLPalmer55

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  smt cha hal  talk 10:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Gregory Kay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Gregory Kay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory Kay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gregory Kay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tech Lighting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tech Lighting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tech Lighting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lightology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lightology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 23:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Question
Hi there SLPalmer55. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. Brianhe (talk) 15:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC) Brianhe (talk) 03:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 19:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Undisclosed paid editing
Sarah, you are clearly here under your own name, and are this person. If you do not disclose your conflict of interest you are going to be blocked. Please reply and work with us. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jytdog, I'm not sure how I can work with you at this point, as all of my contributions have already been removed from Wikipedia. What would you like me to do? SLPalmer55 (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All of your contributions have been removed? Did you not create the following:
 * Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design
 * Paul Gregory (lighting designer)
 * as well as editing the following?
 * Focus Lighting
 * Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
 * George Sexton
 * Architectural lighting design
 * List of lighting designers
 * — Brianhe (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Pardon the hyperbole in my frustration. I guess what I meant was that many of my contributions on which I spent a great deal of time have been removed. A jury of my peers deemed that these contributions were not up to Wikipedia standards, so I cannot justly complain. According to the “conflict of interest” page, I suppose I do have a conflict of interest. Being employed by Lightology, I am personally familiar with the company and its owner, Greg Kay. I suppose that since I did work on these contributions while on the clock, I was technically paid to write them. I understand that you all want to keep Wikipedia’s content as neutral and unbiased as possible, but I feel that most things on Wikipedia are written by people who have at least a passing interest in the subject matter. Why else would anybody write about a given subject? At any rate, I honestly do believe that the subjects I wrote about are of note and deserve a place on Wikipedia; I’m sorry that others don’t yet agree. SLPalmer55 (talk) 00:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edwin F. Guth Memorial Award for Interior Lighting Design& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 09:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)