User talk:SM-Mara

June 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on If Americans Knew. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed  16:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I posted my concerns on the talk page of the article earlier but am not sure what further actions I should be taking. Thank you!SM-Mara (talk) 17:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

"dead links"
Please stop removing WP:REDLINKS unless you have a good reason to believe that the topic will not or should not have an article; red links are not "dead links". I explained that in my edit summary here, yet you just removed it again on that article. In this particular case, consensus has been longstanding and clear that all SCOTUS opinions merit articles. postdlf (talk) 12:12, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about that! As a newbie, I accidentally inserted links to nonexistent wikipedia pages and thought others had done the same! I will try to go back to the places I've done that and put links back in so that articles can be created! Is that a way to alert editors to articles that should be created, or just a way to ensure the link will be there once the articles are created? Thanks for the heads-up.SM-Mara (talk) 17:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding. Re: your questions ("Is that a way...or just a way..."), it's both. postdlf (talk) 21:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)