User talk:SMWIA

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Randall Krager has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Randall Krager was changed by SMWIA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93639 on 2014-09-20T00:17:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Volksfront has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Volksfront was changed by SMWIA (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95057 on 2015-03-27T10:21:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Volksfront shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 22:17, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Complaint about you at WP:AN3
Please see WP:AN3. You have been reported for edit warring at Volksfront. There may still be time for you to reply in that thread, to avoid a block. It looks like you have reverted eight times since April 3. Wikipedia is a group project, not a solo venture. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:56, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)