User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 100

= March 2015 =

Thoroughbred breeding theories
You are right that the article has tone problems, but sit tight and let me take a whack at it first. This is a major deal in the horse racing world, not to be dismissed as mere "fancier" stuff -- millions of dollars are at stake every year because people rely on these things. A major rewrite probably requires more research as well. Montanabw (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC) Follow up:  Restructured, rearranged and toned down the odd phrasings. Probably would be good to review the source material and maybe pull some stuff on this from Blood-Horse, but consulting with WikiProject Horse racing for expert advice might be helpful too, there is one user who does not much else other than add the breeding families to every article on a racehorse that gets a pedigree added. But this is all I'm up for tonight, other fish to fry. I suppose more conversation can occur at that article's talk page, too. Montanabw (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries. I haven't raised any objection to the topic's notability; it's just written in a gee-whiz tone, with a combination of an advocacy/advice voice and a "believe it or not" voice, as if it came from a fancier publication. I don't know enough about horse racing to comment on the topic's real-world importance. In working on the Foundation bloodstock stub, I integrated mention of Thoroughbred breeding theories in the only way it seemed to actually fit that context. Didn't make much sense as a see-also. I'm also not trying to pick on horse articles; I've been working a little on the cat ones (many of which are utter trash), and ended up working on Foundation bloodstock because I needed to link to it from a cat article, and it only addressed horses. That in turn led me to the theories one.  I think that may be misnamed, as it does not appear to represent a theory or collection of theories, strictly speaking (more like a mishmash of hypotheses, guesses, superstitions, preferences, business plans, and some degree of experiment-driven work). But if "Thoroughbred breeding theories" is an established term of art there'll be sources to corroborate that as the WP:COMMONNAME.  If not, then it should probably just be at Thoroughbred breeding.  Either way, there seems to enough material for an article rather than just a section at Thoroughbred.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  05:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree with you about the "gee whiz" tone, hope it's better. Off to the articles, now.  We did spin off that article from Thoroughbred when we took the TB article to FAC; it definitely was a tangential topic.   Montanabw (talk)  08:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh and yes, it's technical language, though "Racehorse breeding theories" and "nicking" are pretty common too. Google it. Thoroughbred breeding isn't a good alt title, as the breeding part is so much more than just analyzing pedigree nicks. This "nicking" thing is, IMHO, kind of voodoo with a computer, but it's also why some horses have illogically high stud fees and others are ridiculously low. Tapit is at $300,000 a mare in spite of a crap race record, while Awesome Again, with a far more impressive race record and equally good babies, is at $75,000.   Montanabw (talk)  08:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll trust your judgement on this. My only real concern was the writing style.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Japonic languages
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Japonic languages. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transylvanian Hound, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dog show and Big game. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Winged unicorn
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winged unicorn. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:António de Oliveira Salazar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:António de Oliveira Salazar. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)
Hello, I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).

One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.

Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 14:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Liberty
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Liberty. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Littleton, Colorado
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Littleton, Colorado. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Amphibians and reptiles of Bulgaria
Greetings! I would like to ask you for assistance related to WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles. I have recently expanded the List of amphibians of Bulgaria and the List of reptiles of Bulgaria and I hope you can spare some time for a copyedit. I consider nominating them for Feature lists and suggestions for further improvement would be very welcome. Best regards, --Gligan (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've done this, with an eye to WP:MOS matters. The short family summaries used in the amphibians list is a good idea, and I hope you'll do that with the reptiles list as well. It's interesting to the reader how widespread certain kinds of organisms are globally, versus their representation in Bulgaria.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  09:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, SMcCandlish! Thank you very much for your work on both lists. I will add family summaries in the reptiles list and will probably proceed with a FL nomination. Best, --Gligan (talk) 16:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Supersessionism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supersessionism. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triturus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fremantle Prison
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fremantle Prison. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)