User talk:SNeK141

March 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Atmospheric refraction, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 21:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SNeK141/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 21:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You're not going to get that on Wikipedia, so you might as well stop while you can. Primefac (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a web host for publishing your personal thoughts and musings. If you wish to do that then I suggest you turn to a blog site instead. Here, we accept only articles on subjects which have notability established by substantial coverage in reliable published sources. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SNeK141/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:SNeK141/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)