User talk:SOhio142


 * Thank you for removing vandalism several times from the Notre Dame Academy (Green Bay, Wisconsin) article. If removing vandalism is your thing, talk to me, and I can recommend tools to make it quicker and easier. Cheers! Royal broil  04:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Notre Dame Academy (Green Bay, Wisconsin)
I have listed the image that was uploaded by the new User:Bobbarker1291 for deletion. The image is sneaky vandalism: The metadata on the photograph proves that it is a copy of the original image that I took of the school. The only difference between the images is that the user has changed the message on the sign to read "Best wishes Shawn". Probably a message to his/her friend. The copyright that I placed on the image requires it to be Attribution ShareAlike, and NEITHER Attribution OR ShareAlike is listed on the image. It is listed as Public Domain, so it is a copyright violation. Royal broil 23:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for using the link to a reliable source in your edit summary. I have added it as a reference to the article. It is helpful and advised for you to add references like that to articles. Then readers can see the link for themself, which is helpful for two reasons. First they can verify that it is true. Second, they might be able to access the link to find out more. Keep up the great work! Royal broil  03:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sikorsky S38 osa ark.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sikorsky S38 osa ark.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Lists of Juice listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lists of Juice. Since you had some involvement with the Lists of Juice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)