User talk:SPECTRE No 5

I've blocked this scrutiny-evading sock. Use your main account to comment on noticeboards. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * floquenbeam Who am I a sock of? You have no proof that I'm anything other than a new user. SPECTRE No 5 (talk)


 * LOL. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

No evidence was given, and the blocker refuses to even name who I'm a sock ofSPECTRE No 5 (talk) 23:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. Floquenbeam is another corrupt and perverted admin

November 2015
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)