User talk:SPGSComms

November 2023
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

You also attempted to whitewash the article of controversy, removing references to allegations of sexual abuse and to Isabel dos Santos. Additionally, you continue to refuse to address your violations of WP:COI. --Yamla (talk) 15:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * So organizations cannot change their own information - is this correct? SPGSComms (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is correct. If you are unblocked, you may use the article talk page to request edits. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 16:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you please update the exam results as 2020 is not recent? We have the official A level and GCSE results from 2023 on the website https://spgs.org/academic/a-level-and-gcse-results/ These results can be found anywhere through a google search. This is the text we would like please: In 2023, 80.5% of GCSE entries were awarded a 9 grade and 94% of entries gained an 8 or 9. This is the eleventh consecutive year that the proportion of A* equivalent grades has exceeded 90%. For A levels, 53% of entries attained an A* grade (or the Pre-U equivalent D1 or D2). 87.04% of entries achieved an A* or A grade and 97.1% a B grade or higher (or the Pre-U equivalent of M1 or M2). SPGSComms (talk) 09:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You have access to this page solely so you can contest your block, not so you can solicit other editors to help you WP:EVADE your block by editing on your behalf. --Yamla (talk) 12:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you please unblock us so we can request edits through the talk page? We won't do our own edits from now on in order to comply with everything. SPGSComms (talk) 13:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I will certainly not do so. However, you are free to have another admin review your block. WP:GAB explains how. --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)