User talk:SPhilSmit/Evaluate an Article

Great review, SPhilSmit! You make a lot of accurate observations about this article, especially with regard to the organization and the discussion on the talk page. As a bit of a warning, not all talk pages are this active - and while an active talk page CAN be a wonderful thing when the other Wikipedians are good, helpful collaborators, it can also potentially be a negative aspect if the other contributors are problematic in any way. Just a heads up as you move forward with your project. Out of curiosity, what made you decide to evaluate this page but not to choose it as your article for the course? Grade: 10/10. Gardneca (talk) 11:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)