User talk:SSugars

Article creation
A tag has been placed on Matt trewhella, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gilliam 21:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Anti-choice
I have reverted your edits to the Crisis pregnancy center article. We have an established rule of thumb to use the terms of self-identity for abortion related political movements. That means we use the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life". This has been a point of contention in the past, but this has been the working consensus. The issue is that wikipedia operates under the neutral point of view. It's understandable that these terms themselves are not neutral, but the opposite terms are even less neutral (pro-death, anti-choice, etc). To balance each other out, and as the acting "most neutral" solution, we allow the movements to use the terms of self-identity, but not the terms that they disparagingly use for their opponents. I hope you understand, and if you have more concerns, feel free to bring them up at a more visible article, such as Talk:Abortion or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Abortion, Talk:pro-life, or Talk:pro-choice. Thanks for your consideration.-Andrew c [talk] 00:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I can see by your latest edits that you are passionate about this issue. However, on wikipedia, we must remain neutral. We also must make sure the content is verifiable by citing sources. I ask you to consider reading WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:CS before editing further. You have added a number of bold claims with no citations.-Andrew c [talk] 00:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)