User talk:STDcall22

Hello. Your link appears to be a single blog entry from a team claiming to have broken Yahoo's captcha system, and inviting readers to install a captcha-recognition engine. This is both "unverifiable research" and a blog not written by a recognised authority, and fails Wikipedia guidelines for external links. If there's a reliable source that writes about these Russian security researchers and confirms that they've achieved something important, though, this could and should be added to the main body of the article. --McGeddon (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice your response. Those sources look absolutely fine! This should definitely be written up in the main body of the article, and put into context, citing those articles. Sorry for being so quick to call spam, but Wikipedia gets a lot of people adding their own random blog entries to external links sections - I should have checked it out more carefully. --McGeddon (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding edits to CAPTCHA
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
 * Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
 * The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://network-security-research.blogspot.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly.	 Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), they are not written by a recognised, reliable source or contain original research.  Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest)
 * Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites.	 For more information about me, see my FAQ page.	 Thanks! SquelchBot (talk) 20:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)