User talk:SW3 5DL/Archive 3

request
Hello, I'm working on the article Vassieux-en-Vercors and the info box is just enormous. I've looked at other pages and their info boxes are much slimmer. Ireland is one. Can we shrink this down to size so it's not compressing the page? Thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * That's from the width of the automatic map in Template:Infobox_French_commune. You might bring that up on the talk page there. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gwen. Malke 2010 (talk) 17:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

HI, I'm back on briefly. Good luck with getting Mr. Grumpy to alter it! If I know Markussep rightly he'll refuse to make any ammendent to it and claim it is fine... Would love your help with Burma and photos!♦ Dr. Blofeld  23:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL, we'll see how it goes. I'm sorting Burma photos now, actually.  Malke 2010 (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

America
It has to do with context. If someone says, "That's an American," it's most likely someone from the states. However, if one titles a written work Butterflies in America, many would think it might have to do with butterflies in continental North and South America: Butterflies in the Americas or Butterflies in the United States would be the spot on titles, to skirt any misunderstanding. Hence, the article shouldn't be renamed, the name of the country is the United States, anything else would be ambiguous. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I was just asking if there is a Wikipedia policy about it that says it must be so. I do see your point, but I wouldn't be confused by the two, and the redirect is there.  Also, reading the lede would make it plain that it is slavery in America, and afterall, that is a huge part of American history as the country was built almost entirely with slave labour.  The books I'm using as sources all say, "America," and it is common among scholars and Professors to say, "Slavery in America," as college courses are titled as such.  And, as I mentioned, being that America was built by slave labour, I thought it a fitting title.  Anyway, I'll bring it up on the talk page when I've finished rewriting the article.  Malke 2010 (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Vassieux-en-Vercors
I think you're missing something. "want pic smaller; more room for lede" made the image *larger*, not smaller. And the image belongs in the infobox. The infobox has 270 baked-in for image sizes and if you want to change that get consensus on the talk. Before you mess with things, again, please explain how 270 is so 'huge'. It's only a tad larger than is quite typical. Are you on a machine with really low res video? FYI, I'm seeing a lede that doesn't even reach as far right as the infobox. Jack Merridew 03:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Macbook.Malke 2010 (talk) 17:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks!
I haven't been on Wikipedia for a while and was greeted by such a pleasent surprise with your barnstar - Thank you very much. Please know that your fairness and rational thinking are appreciated as well. Happy Thanksgiving! Shoreranger (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, Shoreranger. It was my pleasure.  And thanks for the compliment.  Happy Thanksgiving to you, too.Malke 2010 (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Just saw it, (your pic of an Myanmar orphaned child)
What a lovely picture. So you where there in 2006; Please tell me more about it either here or by e-mail. Best, TMCk (talk) 17:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hallo, mein Freund. Long time, no see.  Hope all is well.  On Myanmar, we try to go every year, except right after the cyclone they wouldn't let anybody in.  I've put up more photos from 2006 on Wikicommons.  I put them all under "Cities in Myanmar."  I've lots more.  Haven't even started sorting the other years.Malke 2010 (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I see that you had to welcome yourself at commons;). I did (had to do) the same thing at some foreign wiki as far as I remember... XD.Anyhow, I see that you just uploaded those pictures recently so you probably see how it came to me as a surprise. While reading your response I've also checked my e-mail account (which I rarely check) and found your e-mails which I'll try to answer although it might take a few days. Hope you don't mind.About your latest e-mail, it seems to be a misunderstanding as it doesn't look as bad as you think but I'll tell you more per e-mail if the issue is still ongoing by the time of my response.TMCk (talk) 21:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * PS: I meant to say that if the latter issue comes up again...;) TMCk (talk) 21:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep.Malke 2010 (talk) 22:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the barnstar.
Thanks for the barnstar, Its acually my first! Bonewah (talk) 01:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. And may it be the first of many to come.  Happy holidays. :)  Malke 2010 (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

help wanted
Hi, I have a question. In listing an AfD, what is the category letter for Christianity and Catholic related articles? Thanks.Malke 2010 (talk) 17:23, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * There doesn't seem to be a specific one for Chritianity/Catholic articles. The only place I found related AfDs in at cat=S which is "Category:AfD debates (Society topics)".  Shearonink (talk) 18:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I did see that Christianity category on another AfD.  Maybe they don't use it anymore.  Malke 2010 (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * See also Category:AfD debates (Nominator unsure of category). Gwen Gale (talk) 19:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gwen. Didn't know that was there.Malke 2010 (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, forgot to mention that Jclemens found what I was looking for. It's "Christianity related articles."  Malke 2010 (talk) 19:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * WikiProject Deletion sorting/Christianity. Seems there's a weakness in how WP:AFD is written. Gwen Gale (talk) 20:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Thank you for taking the time to find that.Malke 2010 (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Marian articles
As you and I rightly noted, there were process problems on the deletion of the "Catholic views......." article. But I also noted some other things. One is a consensus (at least amongst the folks present) that there were too many closely related Marian articles. I also noted that I believe that you have both expertise and interest in coverage in this area. I lack expertise in this area, so please feel free to tell me to go pound sand, but is there any chance that you could suggest something to move the Marian article(s) as a whole onward an upward, even if that meant leaving the "Catholic views...." article behind? Just a thought, please ignore if I am out of line. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 23:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Catholic views is gone for six, but what I'd like to see is the articles get out of the editing isolation they seem to be in. A good way to do that might be to put up an RfC on the Wikiproject Catholicism page and send notices out to everybody who has ever edited those articles and tell them their input would be welcome.  I don't think that would be seen as canvassing, but who knows.  And then at some point someone, I think Paul Nyugen and Johnbod would be best, who could be moderators, like the mediation cabal editors.  And then look at the list and decide on merge/delete, etc.  The problem of course is getting the cooperation so that things go smoothly and it doesn't start to become one editor making all the decisions again.  The more editors willing to participate, the more likely will be success.  I was thinking of withdrawing the AfD's and making that suggestion.  What do you think?Malke 2010 (talk) 01:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to confess that I'm not up to speed on the happenings in the related articles. Also on the people involved.  The only active participant at the Catholic views... article debate that I seen a lot before long term is Maurader..... who I've seen a lot before and has always been solid.  (even though he/she indirectly had an opposing view on my process point there)  It sounds like anything that will get more people involved would be a plus, such as the RFC.   That would be a proper forum, not canvassing. But I have an extra comment as a "let's roll, let's get it done" type person.   But for a complex topic (e.g. architecture of a group of articles), you need more than lots of people, you need someone to make a good proposal. You seem to be knowledgable in this area and be interested in overall progress. Maybe you could make such a proposal.   If you will forgive me, if you have any biases etc. from past or to-be-immediately ended battles, leave them behind when making a proposal.  And ending any current battles (RFD's etc.) would simplify things immensely for this process....to the point of being a necessity, and so, IMHO, a good idea to say the least. North8000 (talk) 12:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * An RfC proposal has to be worded properly and posted in the right place, etc. I'm thinking WikiProject Catholicism.  For the AfD's, I don't see a proper procedure so I'm going to track down an admin to advise.Malke 2010 (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks


Arzel has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks Malke! Have a great Christmas and New Years. Arzel (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Welcome. Thanks for the cookie! Happy Christmas and New Year's to you too.  Malke 2010 (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas Malke
Hey Malke,

I know it's a little early but, unfortunately, there are no computers where I'm heading. (Over the hills and through the woods at 80 to 120 MPH. WooHoo!)I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas (Nollaig Shona Dhuit) and a Happy New Year! Zaereth (talk) 01:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas Malke
Hey Malke,

I know it's a little early but, unfortunately, there are no computers where I'm heading. (Over the hills and through the woods at 80 to 120 MPH. WooHoo!)I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas (Nollaig Shona Dhuit) and a Happy New Year! Zaereth (talk) 01:56, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, see you when you get back. Happy New Year. (Athbhliain faoi.) Malke 2010 (talk) 16:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Message From Malke?
I began using Wikipedia to occasionally research information about things back when I was in school, and I still occasionally use it for personal insight to miscellaneous subjects I'm interested in at the time. I only know how to use Wikipedia for research purposes, and I've never even made an account. However, today while I was researching something, there was a link at the top of the page saying I had received a message. It appears as follows:

User talk:70.178.119.43 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search [edit] March 2010.

'''Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did to Rebecca Gayheart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please note that Wikipedia administrators can block editors who engage in vandalism and other disruptive behavior. Thank you.Malke2010 04:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)'''

Like I stated, I'm not very versed in using Wikipedia. I'm not even quite sure if I'm sending you a message correctly. At the bottom of the message where it states "Malke", I assumed this meant you sent that message to me. If so, I'd like to inform you that you're incorrect because I've never edited any article, nor have I even been to Rebecca Gayheart's Wikipedia Article, nor do I even know or desire to know who she is. That being said, you must have confused my IP address with that of another user.

If I am, in fact, wrong about how I received this message, then I completely apologize for bothering you and thank you for taking the time to acknowledge my concern. Yet, if you did send me this message, this is my reply:

'Please refrain from sending counterproductive''* messages to users as you did to me. Your message appears to constitute an arrogant presumption and should be retracted. If you would like to ensure your presumptions are targeted at the correct user, please don't rely on IP addresses alone, for they can be confused; i.e. shared computers. Please note that I have never edited an article, so I must not have engaged in vandalism and other disruptive behavior while not editing the articles that I never edited. Therefore, Wikipedia administrators should not block me because I'm not an editor, but if they choose to anyway-- I'll survive by gaining information elsewhere. Thank you.'''

* "Counterproductive" is an example of a better choice word in this sentence because "unconstructive" isn't a word.

70.178.119.43 (talk) 18:28, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Malke is not editing at the moment, but I can answer in her stead. She posted her message in March 2010 to another individual who had been allocated the ip you are using - not to you. The box below the message on your ip user talkpage clarifies the issue. You may even have a new ip address when you read this. There is very little chance of an admin blocking you for a warning made to this address almost a year ago - as we (I happen to be an admin) are fully aware that the individual receiving an old message is likely to be different from the one that incurred it. Relax, have some WP:Tea, and continue enjoying using the encyclopedia. Cheers, LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Mark, thanks for commenting. That was hilarious.  Malke 2010 (talk) 17:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Sorry for leaving you guys hanging, somewhat, on the TPM issue. RL kind of collapsed on me and I've only just been dug out. No, I wasn't in jail. Digiphi ( Talk  ) 02:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)-
 * XD, jail. I wouldn't have thought of that.Malke 2010 (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Wendi Deng Murdoch
The credit for listing the proposed move actually goes to Ohconfucius who put my response to him in a new section. But I'm happy to fight the battle for a bit of common sense here. --AJHingston (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Age of Consent Chris Hansen
What do you mean when you say there's no such thing as the age of consent? Obviously the reason talking to these teens is illegal is because there underage, that's why I added the age of sexual consent comment. In most states if they were 16 or older it wouldn't be a problem. And Dateline stops at age 15. That's why I was clarifying that they're talking about young teens. --RJR3333 (talk) 04:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I know that the age of consent in most states is 18 I was wrong to say it was 16 in all states but in some states it is I've read the text of Indiana and Georgia's law and there is nothing in them that forbids having sex with someone 16 or 17 unless the person works at the minor's school or place of employment. I know that in Wisconsin, Wyoming, Pennsyvania, Tennesse, Maryland, and many other states its 18 I'm just saying there are exceptions. But even if the age of consent was 21 it still doesn't change the fact that the reason these people go to jail is because the minors are below the age of consent. If they were 18 or older they certainly wouldn't be going to jail. So the addition was appropriate. I'm not saying 16 is legal in all states. --RJR3333 (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Malke if you look at the To Catch a Predator it says the phrase "below the age of consent (12-15) which is exactly what I said. So what I added is exactly what was in the show's article. Its not incorrect. I have tried to discuss this with you and correct some of your incorrect views about the law but you won't listen. And it seems you didn't even read the article you showed me about the Georgia case. --RJR3333 (talk) 01:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The show's Wikipedia article is not correct. And we don't use other Wikipedia articles as a reference.  Please revert your edits.  You have no citations to back them up.  As I told you on your talk page, several times now, there is no such thing as "age of consent" regarding sex in any of the statutes.  It's misleading.  Your edits are original research and now you've engaged in edit warring. Malke 2010 (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Well I used to think the age limit was 18 in every state and two of the users Legitimus and Flyer22 told me I was wrong and that a handful of states have it at 16 or 17. And the text of the laws seems to indicate that they are correct. Are you telling me their wrong? I'm confused, first Legitimus calls me a liar for saying its 18 in every state now you call me a liar for saying it isn't which is it, its almost as if wikipedia intentionally contradicts itself? --RJR3333 (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know about anyone calling you a liar. I certainly did not.  You seem unable to understand how the editing works on Wikipedia.  You are putting in your opinion, as you talk page responses/comments illustrate.  You seem to be convinced that such a thing as "age of consent" regarding sex exists in the United States.  It does not.  The statutes exist to protect children from sexual predators they do not exist to announce it's okay to have sex with children after a certain age.Malke 2010 (talk) 01:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok I think I understand what you're saying the term age of consent is not really the correct term but instead of focusing on what we call it lets focus on the main issue. I believe that in some states, for example Georgia, it is legal for an adult to have sex with a 16 year old, from reading these laws you are correct they don't say its ok to have sex with people after this age but since all they say is for example in Georgia anyone who has with anyone below 16 is guilty of pedophilia, if it does not say anything about a person after say 21 not being allowed to have sex with someone below 18, doesn't that by default make 16 legal, or are you saying its still illegal? Because according to Legitimus it is legal in some states and according to you it isn't, which is it? I'm not neccesarily saying I have an opinion whether it should be, I'm just asking if he was correct in his interpretation or not? You seem to be saying with anyone below 18 is pedophilia, but Legitimus said in some states the pedophilia laws define 16 as their limit. Again if its not banned in the law, that by default makes it legal. And notice I took down my edit and even the other person's edit citing numbers and age of consent so don't say I'm still edit warring. --RJR3333 (talk) 01:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Pedophilia refers to adults who have sex with pre-pubescent children. Sexual predators is the term often used for adults who have sex with pubescent children between the ages of 13 and 17.  No, it does not make sex with someone age 16 legal by default.  You misunderstand the laws.  It is not legal in Georgia, or anywhere, for an adult to have sex with a teenager who is under the age of 18.   You're reading the statutes wrong.  You completely miss where the statutes distinguish between misdemeanor and felony, between an 18 year-old having sex with a 17 year-old, and a 50 year-old having sex with a 17 year-old.  The laws in the United States exist to protect children from exploitation by adults 18 and up.  They do not exist to announce to the world when it's okay to sexually exploit children.  By custom and statute, Americans don't like children under the age of 18 to be having any sex with any body, but especially not with adults.  Malke 2010 (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAges_of_consent_in_North_America&action=historysubmit&diff=432913071&oldid=432861517 I argued what you said to Legitimus and he claims what you said isn't true and that close in age exceptions aren't a factor in any law. And it seems to me like allowing a close in age exception is illogical, either a person is old enough to have sex or he isn't, that would be like allowing a 9 year old to have sex with a 10 old based on their closeness in age. But anyway are you saying Legitimus is wrong? Because if he is the article about age of consent in North America for sex needs to be changed because it doesn't mention what you said it makes it look like Indiana and a few other states simply set the age limit at 16. --RJR3333 (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Also you have not provided any statute that shows it is illegal in Indiana or Georgia for say, a 30 year old to have sex with a 16 year old. The article you showed about someone who was with a 15 year old, not 16, and he was 17 so it also illustrates that close in age exceptions are not a factor in Georgia law. So basically this is the point, either you are not telling the truth, or Legitimus and the wikipedia age of consent articles are lying, which is it? If you cannot provide evidence that there is a statute specifically forbidding that instead of your vague "by law and custom statement" whereas Legitimus text to the exact text of state and federal laws, why should I believe you over him? --RJR3333 (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Also I changed the 12-15 to 13-15 as you requested even though Chris Hansen has impersonated 12 year olds a few times so don't say I'm edit warring. --RJR3333 (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The article Age of consent is not well sourced and is not accurate. There is no such thing in the United States as "age of consent laws regarding sex" and I seriously doubt that they exist in any Western country except perhaps in Amsterdam where human trafficking in children flourishes.  Many articles on Wikipedia are loaded with factual errors, poor or nonexistent sources, etc., in other words, original research.  It is not exactly the first choice reference for most people.  The 'close in age' gap you are referring to is when the state law uses the age difference to determine whether a felony or a misdemeanor is to be charged.  An 18 year old having sex with a 17 year old: misdemeanor.  A 50 year old having sex with a 17 year old:  Felony.  And with that, I'll close the discussion.  Malke 2010 (talk) 02:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Even if what you said is true and its 18 in all countries then 18 is the age limit for sex. There's still an age of consent. But you still have not shown me where in Indiana or Georgia it says that. I've asked you for a source other than tradition and you have not provided one. And if its 18 in Georgia then why did the legislature consider raising it to 18 in 2005. --RJR3333 (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Also if you are right then why do you criticze my edits to the Hansen when I never stated in that article that 16 was legal but Legitimus and the other editors claim it is in the North America sex laws article and you haven't criticized them for it? Why is everyone on wikipedia criticizing me for both positions one of them has to be true I'm sorry?--RJR3333 (talk) 03:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I've explained, at length, the problem with the edits to the Hansen article. As to others criticizing you, you'll have to ask them for specifics.  As to the other article on "North American sex laws" I've not read it nor have any interest in it.  My suggestion for you would be to learn the basic rules on Wikipedia and make edits that are well sourced and not edits based on opinions and beliefs or on point of view.  Also, you need to stay away from the George W. Bush article.  Your edits there are vandalism.  You are lucky that you have not been blocked for this latest bit: .  That's your second go round there.  You've made lots of reverts and a vandalism tonight.  Go read the rules.  Hope this helps.  Good night.Malke 2010 (talk) 03:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Just one closing thought, if you're taking it upon yourself to take down my edit because you say all countries have an age limit for sex of 18 then you should be willing to research the issue to see if you're incorrect. By which I mean for you to say you're not interested in the article age of consent in North America for sex is kind of ridiculous. --RJR3333 (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Help please
I'd like to create an article on José Padilla the Honduran/U.S. immigrant. Right now his name redirects to the famous Supreme Court case Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky. How can I un-direct it so I can put up the article? I think he's noteworthy enough to have his own article because of the landmark decision in his case and also to make a distinction from the several other Jose Padilla articles on Wikipedia. Appreciate the help. Malke 2010 (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * First, I'm not sure you have the details right. I think that "José Padilla"  is the name of a disambig page and does not redirect.


 * But I think that there are a few redirect pages for that person.  One is "José Padilla (born 1950)" which looks like it redirects to a redirect which redirects to Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky.   Also "Jose Padilla (Honduran)" redirects to Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky.  So your first step is to pick an article title, keeping the above in mind.   After that I could help / would be happy to help.   Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Okay, I think the best title would be José Padilla (Honduran).  Malke 2010 (talk) 20:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, if you mean/want exactly as you just wrote it, (with the gizmo over there "e" in "Jose"), that is a brand new title (with no redirect); you could just put that up as with any new article.  Or, if you prefer "Jose Padilla (Honduran)" (without the gizmo over the "e" in Jose) that is a redirect, I could handle (only) once you are ready to put an article up, (or tell you how to do it).  Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, lose the gizmo! Jose Padilla (Honduran)  Malke 2010 (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * also, I tried using article wizard to make the article and it wouldn't take the name, so we have to undo the redirect first. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:59, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * My suggestion: start it in user space and then we'll move it. I'd wait until it has a couple wp:notability-suitable references before we move it. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Forgot to mention that Jose Padilla (born 1950) that's him too. What do we do about that? Malke 2010 (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Suggest ignoring it for now. Later we'll redirect it to your new article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. But apparently the correct style is to use the gizmo and redirect the name that doesn't have the gizmo.  Malke 2010 (talk) 22:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * As noted, that's even simpler....that title does not exist, so you should be able to simply make a new article. North8000 (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It turns out, we need admins for this. Two of them are working on right now.  Thanks, North.  Appreciate the help.   Malke 2010 (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, signing off. North8000 (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Poll on ArbCom resolution - Ireland article names
There is a poll taking place here on whether or not to extend the ArbCom binding resolution, which says there may be no page move discussions for Ireland,Republic of Ireland or Ireland (disambiguation), for a further two years. Fmph (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. Malke 2010 (talk) 02:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Charles Barkley still has game
.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html?ref=todayspaper

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:27, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Charles Barkley still has game
.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html?ref=todayspaper

DYK
Here are some helpful links for DYK:
 * The rules - Important to read and understand before working on a DYK.
 * [|Supplimentary rules] - Basically an FAQ or place to go when compliance with a rule is in question. Best to read over these as well.
 * Template:NewDYKnomination/guide - A good run-through on how to use the DYK template for when you are ready to nominate something.

Good luck! Toa  Nidhiki 05  23:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've been wanting to do that. I've a few articles I think would be of interest. Malke 2010 (talk) 23:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

New-adult fiction
Can you explain what this is and provide some sources? I was verging on trying to come up with a speedy delete tag, but I guess it will have to go to AfD if you don't provide something. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, be sure to make it clear even what it is, and provide sources outside of St. Martin's Press. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:43, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. :) The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:45, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Will do. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You should probably source This age group is considered to be the lucrative 'cross-over' category of young-adult titles that appeal to both the young-adult market and to an adult audience. Is two paras enough for the DYK?  The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

MILHIST Military Aviation Questionaire
Hi Malke 2010! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:
 * 1) What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
 * 2) Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
 * 3) What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
 * 4) Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil and filling it out.
 * 1) My strengths
 * 2) Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
 * 3) Sources which I have
 * 4) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 04:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Tea Party Movement
Done :) Black Kite (talk) 20:23, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I appreciate it. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!
You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Margaret Sanger article
Hello. Could you review my contributions to the Margaret Sanger article to see if they were npov enough? --RJR3333 (talk) 07:54, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry it's taken so long to answer. I haven't been around much and I've only just seen your post just now.  You seem to be the only one editing there right now.  I went through the article, it reads okay to me.  It has sources, etc.  I think it's fine.   Malke 2010 (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

How to appeal my block
I can't communicate with other users because I've been blocked from editing. I just made this account to contact you. I was RJR3333, I'm not making edits with this account just asking you, do you know any administrators who I could discuss my block with. I do agree that I should be blocked, but not as long as six months.--RomanPolanski15 (talk) 03:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Courtesy notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Killer Chihuahua 02:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

An RFAR has been filed
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Killer Chihuahua 05:58, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Stupid spartaz
Please accept my apologies. I have a fat finger and a tiny tablet. Maybe looking at my watchlist on a kindle is actually an extremely stupid thing to do. I put your comment back. Sorry. Spartaz Humbug! 16:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund
Hello, Malke 2010! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund. You can read it at WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Huon (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually you have only moved the draft from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund to Articles for creation/Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, not into the main articlespace. I'd strongly suggest improving the references first; otherwise the article might even be tagged for speedy deletion in the mainspace. Huon (talk) 20:51, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll do it right now. Thanks Huon, I appreciate your taking the time to look it over. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:54, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Done! Malke 2010 (talk) 19:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Tea Party movement arbitration case opened
An arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement. Evidence that you wish the Arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence sub-page, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 20, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can contribute to the case workshop sub-page, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democrat and Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Delete and salt
Delete of course means to simply delete the article as normal, but adding salt means:
 * Protect, or salt the Earth ("salt") means that the user thinks that the article, if deleted, should be protected against recreation. This is for cases where the article may be persistently re-created.(per Guide to deletion ).--Amadscientist (talk) 23:59, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 * My suggestion for that was based on the reverting of a number of editors who removed sources that were being misused and what appears to be an attempt to work around policies in this article for partisan bickering. I am of the opinion that these sorts of articles should not be recreated even if merged. The only problem with that is, if the article is merged, I am not sure if it can be salted as the article becomes a redirect but then it could just be locked (protected) in that manner I suppose.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I wondered about it. I was thinking of how meat gets salted and wondered if it meant this was a permanent deletion. Thanks for getting back. I think I like that idea. I'm going to go with that. Malke 2010 (talk) 00:59, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It is a reference to sowing fields with salt, a symbolic gesture, which has current tenure as a meme that they will then not grow anything. It was utilized by the Hittites and Assyrians, and purportedly by the Romans, and is mentioned in the Bible. When we "salt" an article, no future article can "grow" there. Is there an article which needs salting? Killer Chihuahua  20:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's a great explanation. Thanks. The article Amadscientist, and I agree with him, thinks should be salted is the Bush Derangement Syndrome. Seems to have no utility on Wikipedia, but it's survived six attempts to delete it. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, it can't be salted until it is deleted, so let's see how the most recent Afd ends. Killer Chihuahua 21:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It might survive to see a 7th AfD. That's hilarious. Some of the comments, although seriously stated, are hilarious, too. I can see this being on Urban Dictionary, but not Wikipedia. Although maybe I'm missing something. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:33, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the TPM Arb case
Although you have not said so specifically, it may be that your immediate attack on me when I reminded editors of civility was due to stress resulting from the continued toxic environment on the TPM article and talk page. You've stated you would prefer to edit TROUBLES articles because "the difference is night and day" due to editors being under a tighter constraint. So my evidence may be more about the toxic environment rather than your actions, although those actions were less than stellar. Please feel free to link to this post of mine when you post your evidence. I'm not at all certain whether sanctions are indicated in your case; but I do think your actions on the TPM talk page were less than you are capable of. I'm not an Arb, but if you simply say words to the effect of "yeah, could have been more civil, will be in the future" I don't forsee any action being taken regarding your actions, and I think that would close the issue so far as I am concerned. Killer Chihuahua 21:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * You must be psychic, or we knew each other in another life! I'm just now working on that. I'll be posting it within the hour. (Diffs are a pain to get.) Malke 2010 (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Diffs are indeed a bit of a pain to get, but an assertion without a diff is like peeing up a rope. Killer Chihuahua 21:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * LOL, yes, but the boys can pee up a rope. And I doubt if the boy admins would have gotten that desysop bit on the AN/I, but I don't know that ArbCom would appreciate me saying that. On the diff thing, I'm going crazy trying to find a diff for the comment B. Wilkins made on the AN/I. Not the one about the KillerChinchilla, the one he made about what he thought should be done. I thought what he said was smart. Do you know the one I mean? Or was it on another page? Malke 2010 (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you remember any more than that? I'll help you look, but it would be nice to have a wee bit more to go on than that. Are you certain it was BWilkins who made the post you're looking for? And regarding the boy/girl thing, I dunno, but I can guarantee no one would be joking about calling me a bitch like Arthur Rubin is currently doing if I were a guy. If men are strong, they're admired. If women are strong, they're called bitches. Bah. (And no, not by everyone or even the majority - but by enough to make it teh suk.) Killer Chihuahua 22:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that. That was out of bounds. I was very disappointed to see Arthur say that. Okay, on the diff, I think B. Wilkins was saying what he thought should be done with North. In reading it, I had the impression he was saying a block, which is what I thought should have been done. But I could see later on why you had not blocked him.Malke 2010 (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your Arbitration evidence is too long
Hello, Malke 2010. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Tea Party movement Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1118 words and 20 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Hers fold ArbClerkBOT(talk) 10:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nimuaq (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Nimuaq, I corrected errors and developed the page further and went ahead and put it into article space about two weeks ago. I had not created an article in a while and wanted to use the article wizard because it also had the live chat. I apologize for not going back and letting reviewers know about that. Thanks for your time. Malke 2010 (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  17:57, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

TPM ArbCom case Workshop
Hi, you added a proposed remedy to my section on the Workshop page. I have moved it to your section. Killer Chihuahua 21:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Oops! Feel free to move it to the appropriate spot. Malke 2010 (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

More on the Workshop
Hi, Malke! I'm a little bit confused about some comments you have made concerning me; maybe you can help me understand. Specifically, these statements at the TPm ArbCom pages have me concerned: Here, you've stated that I "contribute on a regular basis to the problems on the article". I disagree with that, obviously, and your assertion actually takes me by surprise. Unfortunately, since you have not cited any evidence or provided substantiation, there is no way for me to address this accusation -- that comes off as a bit unfair. Could you please direct me to the contributions of mine upon which you are basing that charge? Nearly daily? I've edited the article on only 13 days over the past 7+ months (~220 days), and sporadically before that, usually when substantive discussion arises. I understand that your point was that I am a relatively regular contributor there, which is accurate, but "nearly daily" makes it sound as if I virtually live there -- but this is a minor quibble. My real objection is to your assertion that, "the article has not improved and working together to improve it doesn't seem to factor into talk page discussions. Banning one editor won't solve that." I can't speak for other editors, about which your criticism may be valid, but working together toward article improvement has always factored into my talk page discussions. Just a few of a great many examples:
 * Topic bans must include Goethean and Xenophrenic -- Any imposition of topic bans must include the editors actively contributing on a regular basis to the problems on the article. March 25 edit
 * Some editors have been regular, nearly daily, contributors for almost three years. This includes Goethean and Xenophrenic. Not just North8000. And Goethean's and Xenophrenic's arguments and edit wars today are the same ones they had back in 2010. The same sections, the same edits. Over and over. In the meantime, the article has not improved and working together to improve it doesn't seem to factor into talk page discussions. Banning one editor won't solve that. North8000 does not edit in a vacuum. March 25 edit
 * As for treating the subjects of racism, homophobia and other bigotry, I liked the idea proposed above of establishing a sub-page somewhere, and collaboratively developing a comprehensive, encyclopedic section on the subject . If written properly, it could replace the whole section presently listing isolated incidents, and it might also replace a portion of the media bias content. It would serve to get rid of the laundry list, as well as stem the inclinations to edit to the two (highly inaccurate) extremes that the tea partiers are a bunch of racists and the tea partiers are not combatting an image problem. Xenophrenic (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 *  Let's work on developing that encyclopedic treatment of the issue . Do that first, and you'll find the need for the present disjointed laundry list of examples and anecdotes will disappear, and we won't need them anymore. Removing them now without first properly addressing the whole issue is inappropriate, and might be misconstrued as leaving the article in a POV state. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I am encouraged to see your expression that you are pro-good article and against POV'ing the article; now let's see if we can put those good intentions into practice . See you in the discussion thread below. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Even editors with whom I frequently disagree have acknowledged that my goal is article improvement:
 * Xeno, sincerely, your post is quite impressive. I mean this sincerely that it gives me hope that you want a good process and a good article vs. just pov'ing. And, in context, it is a sincere relief that now I'm not sure what to think. What do you think about first trying the new thread at the bottom? Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it must be that we're under a blue moon and the earth is off its axis because I actually agree with Xenophrenic. Malke2010 14:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

I can cite numerous additional examples of my efforts toward article improvement, if needed, including one-on-one discussions toward that end with North8000 on his Talk page; outlines of reliable source identification, RfC development, etc. Can you see why your newest assertion has taken me by surprise? You are mostly correct when you say, "Xenophrenic's arguments and edit wars today are the same ones they had back in 2010", since even today I find myself arguing that article content needs to be supported by reliable sources, or arguing against the notion that one TP supporter's views are more or less relevant than another TP supporter's views. But I fail to see how you make the leap to "Banning one editor won't solve that." Solve what? What, specifically, prompts you to call for my banning? I noticed that you amended, almost as an afterthought, your above comment to include this: What? Where did that come from? Just last month, didn't you comment about me, saying:
 * Xenophrenic violates WP:TE. March 25
 * I wouldn't say he's tendentious. He's just determined. Nothing wrong with that. Malke 2010 (talk) 23:08, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

If you have recently changed your mind and come to a different conclusion, I would appreciate it if you would indicate what actions of mine prompted this new charge against me; as of this moment, you have left it unsubstantiated. I've heard similar unsubstantiated charges from North8000, and briefly from Arthur Rubin, but after pressed for substantiation, North admitted that it was just a belief of his that might be "wrong", and that he would prefer to "leave behind and not discuss further", and Arthur couldn't substantiate it either. You were right when you observed that I am determined rather than tendentious; sometimes frustratingly so to editors trying to skirt Wikipedia policies or push agendas, but if you've had a recent change of heart, at least do me the courtesy of clueing me in on what prompted it.


 * KC, you could be seen as involved since you have not included Goethean and Xenophrenic. Please see evidence page re: Goethean. You moderated a dispute after Goethean contacted you. I looked that over. That seemed fine. But now, you don't seem to be seeing Goethean's incivility, WP:BATTLE, and WP:Own, Nor Xenophrenic's. Goethean has even admitted on ANI that his comment at the opening of a thread was wrong. It's not his first comment of that nature. Can you really interpret Goethean's comments to editors as civil? Can you really leave off a close examination of Goethean's comments and Xenophrenic's editing and still be an "uninvolved admin?" March 26

The above statement from you seems mostly about Goethean, since you reference a specific dispute involving him and not me, and you reference a specific admission from him and not me, and you mention a specific comment of his and not mine. But you did toss my name in there as well, again without substantiation. I would like to ask you for that substantiation. Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Xen: It appears I did not find any evidence of problematic editing by you. I've done a strike through here: . Let me know if I've missed any. My sincere apologies for the inconvenience. Malke 2010 (talk) 00:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Xen, apparently in searching the archives I came across two threads and for some reason attributed them to you. I confused them with something else entirely. When I was posting on the workshop, it's obvious now why I couldn't relocate them. It was terribly negligent of me not to stay on that and correct the error right then. Sincere apologies again. Malke 2010 (talk) 01:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that, Malke, it is greatly appreciated. After the current dust-up settles, and the finger-pointing, name-calling, demands for diffs, etc., dies down, maybe we can work on some serious article improvement. It's long overdue. Even when you are disagreeing with me, your usual level of civility doesn't go unnoticed and is certainly appreciated. Xenophrenic (talk) 09:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Xen. Remember this edit? The edit summaries say it all: . Malke 2010 (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1993 Four Corners hantavirus outbreak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Court cases
Please don't de-italicize the titles of articles on court cases, as you did at Miller v. California and Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc. See the second bullet point at WP:ITALIC. Deor (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, good to know. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!
and next time try starting off on the right foot instead, eh? Killer Chihuahua 16:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Awww. . .Puppy, you're so nice! :-) Thank you! Malke 2010 (talk) 17:07, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * And yes, and next time try starting off on the right foot instead, eh? Killer Chihuahua 16:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC) lesson learned on that, eh! Malke 2010 (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Tea Party movement Moderated discussion
A discussion is taking place at Talk:Tea Party movement/Moderated discussion to get consensus on finding and addressing the main points of contention on the article, and moving the article to a stable and useful condition. As you are a significant contributor to the article, your involvement in the discussion would be valued and helpful. As the discussion is currently looking at removing a substantial amount of material, it would be appropriate for you to check to see what material is being proposed for removal, in case you have any concerns about this. If you feel you would rather not get involved right now, that is fine; however, if you later decide to get involved and directly edit the article to reverse any consensus decisions, that might be seen as disruptive. Re-opening discussion, however, may be acceptable; though you may find few people willing to re-engage in such a discussion, and if there are repeated attempts to re-open discussion on the same points, that also could be seen as disruptive. The best time to get involved is right now.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  08:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Tea_Party_movement/Moderated_discussion. Cheers.-- Ubikwit 連絡見学/迷惑 15:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

RFC/U on User:Arzel
You took part in a discussion that dealt with user:Arzel, which took place here. There was a clear community consensus for a topic ban for user:Arzel. Many of the issue fell outside of discussion on TPM. With such a large community consensus and with arbitration committee only dealing with issues directly related to the TPM, I went ahead and started a WP:RFC/U, here.  You are invited to endorse this and to take part in the WP:RFC/U. Casprings (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Did you say something at the ANI? I'm certain you did not mention anything at ArbCom except recently on the talk page. Why this now? Malke 2010 (talk) 02:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Struck for non neutral working.Casprings (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

RFC/U on user:Arzel
You took part in a discussion that dealt with user:Arzel, which took place here. Based on that discussion, I started a WP:RFC/U, here.Casprings (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You haven't answered my question. Malke 2010 (talk) 03:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of New-adult fiction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New-adult fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New-adult fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  00:39, 19 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I have removed the "hangon" template you placed on this article - those are only used where speedy deletion has been proposed, which is not the case here. The deletion discussion will run, normally, for seven days. JohnCD (talk) 14:53, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

need to know
Need help for an article being considered for deletion. How do I contact the 'rescue squad?' and is there a template I can use for that? Thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 14:57, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi. Well, it depends on exactly why it's being considered for deleletion. What article is it? Revent (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * New-adult fiction and there doesn't seem to be a legitimate reason. And someone essentially blanked the page after the nom. I restored the content. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Article Rescue Squadron. There are some links at the top of that page. JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok, I see now...Well, the 'rescue' is essentially the discussion on the articles for deletion thread...if you make your case with the interested people there, then you 'win'. You can ask other people you might think would be interested to weigh in, but you need to be careful about not WP:CANVASSING. Revent (talk) 15:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll ask contributors to the article. Thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Content discussion, resumed
The discussion in the "Content discussion, resumed" section got out of hand, so I have closed it. A number of contributors to that discussion wandered away from commenting on the content into commenting on the contributor. I would ask that everyone make a special effort to word what they say carefully. Comments such as "I think we should seriously consider Arthur's suggestion that we vote to ban Xenophrenic from this page, and I'd add we should vote on whether to topic ban him from Tea Party movement. It's obvious he is not here to edit in a collegial way, nor he is interested in neutral POV. His personal attacks, battles, and disruption are directly opposing the work here and hence, the work on the article", are unhelpful and provoke negative responses.

At this point it might be better if anyone has concerns about the behaviour of anyone else in the discussion, that they bring those concerns direct to me rather than raise them on the discussion page.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  12:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Absolutely. I left a suggestion on the discussion page. Malke 2010 (talk) 17:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

SPA tags
The tags are not there to mark socks/meatpuppets - they give context to anyone wishing to add to/close the discussion. Please do not remove them again. I'm leaving on a trip, so I won't really be able to respond for the next few weeks, but remember that the more you cite WP:AGF, the less you are actually following WP:AGF (see Carbonite's law). Cheers, Ansh666 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You seem oblivious to the fact that tagging these editors like that comes across as offensive and appears to be an attempt to add bias. It makes you look like you're standing in front of the article and waving off the admins from considering their contributions. I don't see any Wikipedia policy that says readers can't sign in and make a comment, nor is there a policy against what appears to be a single purpose account. We have lots of editors on Wikipedia who are revert only accounts and have been for years. I don't see anyone tagging all their edits. IMHO, tagging the editors like that adds bias. Their comments should have the same weight as any other editor's. Any editor can click on the contribs and make a judgement for themselves. But tagging them like that might well put off someone from reading their contribution and certainly it might cause them to discount it entirely. I find it offensive and akin to 'stacking the deck,' and certainly a failure to assume good faith. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There is a difference between a SPA with 1000 edits and one with 3. Of course, from your perspective, I'm doing all of these things, but I honestly don't give a damn about the content of that page: I base all of my AfD commentary off policy ONLY, as do most ordinary participants. I'm sparing others the work of viewing the contribs of 3-4 IPs/accounts separately. It doesn't make their contributions any less valid to anyone without a previous bias. Also, there you go again with AGF. Anyhow, I'm actually going to go now, so later. Ansh666 21:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Please don't come back to my talk page. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:14, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

New-adult fiction article
I saw your request in the Article Rescue Squadron talk page for people to examine this article. I did and decided to register a 'keep' vote. I did so, because I examined the article and many of the sources and I agree the subject should have its own page. Decided not to say anything on the Squadron talk page after someone made a comment about what I had said in another discussion. I always look at the subject's merits, or lack thereof, presented in each AfD discussion and vote my views. Bill Pollard (talk) 03:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That's great news. Well done you for taking the time to look it over. I've been working on rewriting the article with new sources. So much has happened with the subject since I started the article way back when that it really needs a good rewrite. Thanks for the support. Malke 2010 (talk) 03:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Moderated Discussion at Tea Party movement
Let me say from the beginning that this is not canvassing. This is an attempt, with the best of intentions for Wikipedia, to resolve a problem.
 * I think we should seriously consider Arthur's suggestion that we vote to ban Xenophrenic from this page ... I recommended that at ArbCom, but I'm not sure they'll do anything; unfortunately the Moderated Discussion page and the article's main Talk page are not appropriate places for such a discussion. The gentleman has been engaged in this behavior on several articles related to U.S. politics for several years. It's completely unacceptable. So I recommended, and I'm again recommending, a topic ban on all articles related to U.S. politics, broadly construed.
 * I recommend RFC/U as they did with Arzel. Allegedly ANI is also an appropriate forum to begin with, but that has every likelihood of turning into a bloodbath. We need to go to RFC/U first to establish tone, numbers, and the body of evidence. You and Arthur could certify the RFC/U, we could discuss it, and then (if consensus suggests it) we could move to ANI and "vote" on a community ban. In an RFC/U followed by ANI, we do not need to rely on ArbCom to make the decision. We're the ones who have had to deal with this behavior on a daily basis, so we're the ones who are in the best position to see the problem and the solution with the greatest clarity. We'd need to bring SilkTork into it to ensure no one challenges its legitimacy.
 * This should be done with the caveat that Xeno should have the option of asking for a removal of the topic ban, after a substantial period (six months to a year) of productive work on other articles. I'd like to believe that almost anyone can be rehabilitated, and he does have the potential to be a productive editor. And it is altogether possible that during the course of all these discussions, Xeno may accept that his behavior is unacceptable, and change his behavior without a topic ban at all. I am placing the same message on Arthur's page. kind regards ... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All right, that sounds like a reasonable path to follow. And let's add that any removal of a topic ban will require he edit with a mentor. He appears to need the perspective a mentor can provide. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, it takes two people to certify an RFC/U. I suggest you coordinate this with Arthur. Move forward, it'll be over in about a week, you can copy evidence from ArbCom and discuss it calmly, and then proceed to ANI. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you get it started, does it still take two more people? I thought it took only one, but then I don't get involved in these things. I spoke up for Arzel because it was totally unfair the way it was done. Thankfully the editor listened to the community and closed it. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I've done this before, the other person bailed out on me after a day, and I was left looking stupid. That isn't happening this time. I'm going in with three people certifying. I was hoping you and Arthur would start it since the two of you seemed motivated in the Moderated Discussion, and I'd step in if one of you bails out. But that's fine, I'll start it. I will be back with a link once it's started and you can certify it. Find a diff of one of your Talk page edits where you tried to reason with Xeno. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, will do. Send the link as soon as. Go round to Arthur and let him know. Malke 2010 (talk) 03:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Here is the RfC/U: Please certify it and provide diffs of your efforts to resolve these disputes with Xenophrenic. I think you'll be ablke to find some on the Moderated Discussion page. kind regards ... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 07:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I realize your schedule is difficult this week. All I'm asking for here immediately is certification of the RfC/U, which is just your four-tilde signature in the appropriate spot, plus a few diffs showing your attempts to resolve the issue with Xeno, which should be easy to find on the Moderated Discussion page. The deadline is roughly tomorrow night at midnight, West Coast time. Any evidence you present at a future date could just be a copy of whatever you're going to present at ArbCom. regards ... Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm working on it right now. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557603145 your edit] to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement suspended
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by that the Tea Party Movement case be suspended until the end of June 2013 to allow time for the Tea Party movement/Moderated discussion. Pages relating to the Tea Party movement, in any namespace, broadly construed, are placed under discretionary sanctions until further notice. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Good news. Thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

help with MfD
I'm following the directions to nominate a page for MfD but when I preview it isn't coming out right. Thanks.


 * What you should put into the MfD page is just:

 ~ </tt>


 * Replace "Reason why the page should be deleted" with your reason, but leave everything else unchanged. Don't replace "PAGENAME" with the name of the page. JohnCD (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll have another go. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It might be helpful to annotate the (8?) links on the MfD page, as well as bracket correction on #4. — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Coronavirus frameshifting stimulation element (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Upstream and downstream


 * Kissing stem loop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Recombination

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557773696 your edit] to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * It wasn't me Bot, I swear. It was a trolly type IP. Malke 2010 (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558076579 your edit] to Kissing stem loop may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558350773 your edit] to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

start Donovan Berlin article
Hello, Malke. Can you do me a favor? I started an article about Donovan Berlin, designer of the P-36 and P-40. Since I'm not registered, I need someone to move it from theDonovan Berlin talk page to its article page. Thanks for your help. --108.45.72.196 (talk) 22:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I just noticed you're busy IRL. I'll post my request at the Military History project, too.  Thanks.  --108.45.72.196 (talk) 22:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Go fix the references. Malke 2010 (talk) 22:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you Malke, I appreciate it. Are named refs not allowed in the lead?  --108.45.72.196 (talk) 23:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There's broken link. I'm trying to fix it. Malke 2010 (talk) 23:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, go back and add your cites one at a time, and then check preview to see how you're doing. I'll also do a reflinks later. Malke 2010 (talk) 23:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

See Changes in Donovan Berlin article. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Brilliant! Well done! And great with the photos. I was going to look for them today. Great job, thanks. Malke 2010 (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe we could bring it to FA. Malke 2010 (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I think I may have exhausted all my available resources, until I check in with my local air museum library and archives next week. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That's fine. There's no rush. We can build it up gradually. I'm sure there's enough about him somewhere.Malke 2010 (talk) 14:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

I put some suggestions for sources on the article talk page. I don't have access to them. --108.45.72.196 (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All right, I'll see what I can do. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Check out the Donovan Berlin article now- it perhaps should be relisted as Don R. Berlin was the more commonly used name. Nonetheless, the article now fully covers an interesting individual's life work. FWiW, lots of refs did show up, and I haven't even hit the local air museum library yet. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look now. I agree about moving it to Don R. Berlin as IP has suggested, although a Google search seems to return more Donovan Berlin's than Don R. Berlin. Malke 2010 (talk) 14:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Your work there has been brilliant! I like the photos you've found. I moved the article to Don R. Berlin. Can we get it to GA? Malke 2010 (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention the additions you've made to his engineering info box. I was very happy to find that box. I figured somebody with engineering knowledge would have thought of it. It really works well. Malke 2010 (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

That's very kind, thanks!
 * I heartily endorse Bzuk's action in giving you this award, Malke. Thanks for your help.  --108.45.72.196 (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and thanks for asking me to participate. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Problematic edit
It appears the edit you are concerned about took place on another page unrelated to the Tea Party. Please do not bring up matters unrelated to the Tea Party on the discussion page - if you have concerns about other editors there are venues for that. If you feel it might relate to matters regarding the Tea Party then you know that the procedure is to approach me directly. This is a warning not to do such a thing again or you will be blocked.  SilkTork  <sup style="color:#347C2C;">✔Tea time  15:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * No, he made it on the moderated discussion. I just emailed it to you. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, wanted to mention, I don't know anything about any incidents on other pages involving this editor regarding any such comments. Apparently you have arrived here after Collect made this post on your talk page. . Whatever that is, is not at all what I was referring to on the moderated discussion. Malke 2010 (talk) 17:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. I am now aware of the incident on the Tea Party page, and have given a warning for that. I apologise to you for issuing the above warning before being fully aware of the facts. However, the caution to bring such concerns directly to me rather than raising them on the talkpage remains.  SilkTork  <sup style="color:#347C2C;">✔Tea time  05:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that. And yes, your talk page would be the place. Malke 2010 (talk) 05:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Help Desk
It would have been nice if you'd come back to the help desk and let us know you'd figured out what to do with Coronaviridae, so we didn't waste time on it for you. Rojomoke (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry. I meant to do just that but then sidetracked myself by putting up the new article. I'm sorry you went to all that trouble. Malke 2010 (talk) 07:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No biggie Rojomoke (talk) 08:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I shall owe you a favor, then. Malke 2010 (talk) 08:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betacoronavirus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Morphology and Nidus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Herbert O. Fisher
See new article that came out of earlier Don R. Berlin development. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Fantastic job! Well done you. Malke 2010 (talk) 03:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Petition
Thanks for the big red notice about the petition. I didn't even know it existed. So much for great communication. I edited it. Grammar and punctuation. Signed it too as #31. Respectfully,  Tiyang (talk) 06:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Glad you found it. I like the changes and didn't have any problems like others. But would have liked a heads up. Put up a notice on your talk page for others. Malke 2010 (talk) 23:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You are the better editor and I apologize profusely. You were kind to not mention how many rules I violated.  I am not certain a notice about the Petition on my talk page would even be noticed.  I do not know how to do it either.  Would you help me?  Again, I apologize to you.  Very respectfully,   Tiyang (talk) 13:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

MERS-CoV restructuring
Your opinion on improving the MERS-CoV article is appreciated here. ComfyKem (talk) 12:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree, it needs it. Malke 2010 (talk) 13:19, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Need another favor
Hi, Malke 2010. I know you're very busy, but, when you get a minute, can you move something for me, again? Please move, from my talk page, what I've done on Desiderio Scaglia to article space. I'm still refining it, but it can be moved now. Could you also tag it so it says it was mostly translated from the article on the French Wikipedia? Thank you for your help. There's no rush (he's been dead for almost 400 years). --108.45.72.196 (talk) 01:45, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * ✅ It was my pleasure. Malke 2010 (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot, Malke 2010. I owe you another one!  --108.45.72.196 (talk) 05:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Anytime. I'm getting the tag for it. Malke 2010 (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I stumbled across your request at the help desk and tagged the article page and the talk page (now they both look ugly). --108.45.72.196 (talk) 06:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * OKay. Did you tell the Help page you'd done it? Malke 2010 (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I did, just now, and sort of continued the conversation with a question. --108.45.72.196 (talk) 04:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I went over there the same day and saw they'd responded and thanked them. I like to make sure to follow-up if we solve it beforehand. I'll take a look. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:24, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

small informal request
Thank you for the kind thought of welcoming me on my ip talk page. One of the reasons I prefer to edit as an ip is to avoid personalized conflict. I have requested editorial help here, but am not sure exactly how else I can respond with a light touch to insistent accusations of vandalism/disruption (on my talk page and elsewhere) by a recent new user despite having pointed out that this is not what "vandalism" actually means. I would rather back off and would appreciate some thoughtful informal assistance, if possible, from an experienced editor not involved in WP:MED. Thank you, 81.157.7.7 (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I've looked over the edits. I'm not familiar with the article but it appears to be a content dispute. I don't see any vandalism on your part. I do see a bit of an edit war but there is talk page discussion so that might settle down. You're a WP:NEWBIE and you're not aware of all the rules. One of the rules is that we don't accuse editors of vandalism when it's really a content dispute, so Seppi333 might need a reminder. I don't know anything about his editing history. You don't have a named account and IP's are known for vandalism on Wikipedia. This makes it easy to call what you are doing vandalism.


 * There are some rules you need to know right away. WP:3RR, that's a big one and if you violate that you could be blocked from editing for a period of time. If you keep it up, especially editing as an IP, and administrator is likely to block you indefinitely, so learn that rule. The other is WP:BRD. You can make a bold edit, but if it gets reverted, you need to discuss on the talk page. About the sources, there is a noticeboard that helps to sort the quarrels over sources used. In general, I'd day the age of a source does not preclude it's use unless it refers to content no longer considered relevant, especially in scientific/medical articles. Newer studies that supplant old information would be preferred.


 * If an editor persists in calling you a vandal, I'd take the behaviour to an administrator and mention the problem. You would need to provide links to the place where you were called a vandal so he/she could evaluate it. An editor can actually get blocked from editing if they call another editor a vandal. I'll leave a note on his talk page.


 * I don't know where I was when I noticed you were new to Wikipedia. The template I put on your talk page has some basic information and you should read it and follow the links. That will get you started. Malke 2010 (talk) 15:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the trouble to reply in such detail Malke 2010.


 * Actually I'm not a newbie and I'm not sure quite where you think I've been "acting like a newbie" (except perhaps in getting flustered). Presumably, you assumed I'm a newbie because I choose to edit as an IP (as I explained above). In reality, my IP address last changed while I was in the course of making a detailed revision to Infectious_mononucleosis. I am aware of WP:3RR and I believe the edits/reversions I made at  Amphetamine mixed salts (medication) in response to a request for assistance at WT:MED were appropriate (though I much prefer just improving articles than exposure to conflict). Thank you. 81.157.7.7 (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, that explains some things. You know of course that you're more at risk for not being taken seriously, or worse, have your edits misinterpreted because you're editing as an IP. I did ask Seppi333 to stop calling you a vandal. You're using the talk page, so that's good. I don't know the subject but it seems an ordinary content dispute. If you've edited before, then you know you can always call on an admin for help. Just be careful removing content that's been there for a while. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Please see my talk page. There's a new issue and I've explained there. Seppi333 (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have just read the new accusations and will back off from the conflict (though I still consider the issue raised at WT:MED by User:Hildabast to be a pertinent one for the integrity of Wikipedia). 81.157.7.7 (talk) 16:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * That was why I called on you in your "experienced editor" guise (rather than as an Admin with tools) to help clarify WP:VANDAL to a new editor who is confusing vandalism with a content dispute. Can I take the opportunity of suggesting that (IMO at least) constructive IP contributors deserve being "taken seriously" in the same way as any other user? Regards, —81.157.7.7 (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, you absolutely are correct to insist that you be taken seriously as I've demonstrated by helping you. I was simply reminding that frequently IPs are here to vandalize and sometimes editors use the same brush to paint all. Apologies for any misunderstanding. Malke 2010 (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No problem. —81.157.7.7 (talk) 16:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

New section
I have added a new section Prevention to the Coccidioidomycosis article, could you please read it in your spare time. Regards, --Murus (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, well done. The article needed that. Here is a link to the California Dept of Health. You might want to mention the use of masks for farm workers. Not sure if this is an OSHA requirement yet. . Malke 2010 (talk) 16:58, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * That is a great lead! Thank you so much! --Murus (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Elizabeth II
The question posed at the Elizabeth II RfC, at which you commented, has been amended to clarify a potential misunderstanding. Please re-visit the question and your comment and amend if necessary. Thanks. DrKiernan (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, DrK for the notice. I've kept the same ivote. HM is all that and a lover of Corgis. Malke 2010 (talk) 17:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of In ovo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In ovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/In ovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ansh666 05:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In ovo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Inactivated and Attenuated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, man
Thank you for the post inviting me to join. I have/had an account, but am editing as an IP. Not any sneaky crap either...just get mad at the website ('s moderators/community), plus it is a time suck.

Keep up the kindnesses and your education is impressive.

98.117.81.134 (talk) 21:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)


 * You're welcome and thank you for the compliments. Malke 2010 (talk) 21:47, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Collaboration
Hi, nice Malke. Can you please review and fix "Fluorine". It is a labor of love. It's long, so just the bio/hazard/enviro sections would be great contribution.-TCO

P.s. I'll refrain from Dartmouth Indian allusions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.137.171 (talk) 14:41, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL, WaHooWah! Malke 2010 (talk) 16:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spillover infection, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nipah and Hendra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks, North. Very kind of you. I appreciate it. Malke 2010 (talk) 02:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Clarification request
The clarification request involving you has been archived. The [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&oldid=590600729#Arbitrator_views_and_discussion_2 comments left by arbitrators] may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 04:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Rschen7754. Malke 2010 (talk) 06:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=591220373 your edit] to Bat-borne virus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * * [http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/zoonoses/rabies/ New York Dept. of Health: Bats and

Please comment on Talk:United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!
Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.
 * Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with   with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
 * Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
 * To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
 * To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
 * You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
 * You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.
 * You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation!  D ip ta ns hu Talk 12:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Viruses
Thanks for all those Virus articles! I have only managed one or two! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC).


 * Thank you for saying. We need more. Maybe you could write some when you have more time? SW3 5DL (talk) 04:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I plan to. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC).



Please comment on Talk:US Airways
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:US Airways. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pavle Đurišić
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pavle Đurišić. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:23, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Fitzgerald (Irish republican), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork, Ireland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quis separabit? Thanks for letting me know. I've seen others vote again in the relisting so you're saying that's not allowed then? SW3 5DL (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, in re Articles for deletion/Michael Fitzgerald (Irish republican) — text from your last comment has been hidden pending your reformatting the commentary. It's not about duplicating comments but voting Keep twice, which could be misleading. Thanks. Quis separabit?  18:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


 * As far as I know it's one vote per editor. Relisting, as I discern it, is when there is a paucity of (or only minimal) editor involvement in a particular AFD or CFD, and an attempt is made to gather more input and consensus from others who have not contributed but may be drawn in by relisting notices. Yours, Quis separabit?  19:50, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Politics of the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Politics of the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fedor Emelianenko
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fedor Emelianenko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Username
That's the first time I've seen a postcode used for a username. If it's yours, you're asking for trouble and should go to get it changed immediately.-- Laun  chba  ller  17:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Username
Hello SW3 5DL, If your username is your actual postcode - It's probably a wise idea to change your username ASAP!

On the other hand if it's not yours then just ignore me :)

Happy Editing :)

Regards, →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  05:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of media adaptations of Journey to the West
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of media adaptations of Journey to the West. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Largest cities of Kosovo
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Largest cities of Kosovo. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acer saccharum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern seaboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for thanks
I have received notification of your thanks. I much appreciate your attitude and intention, and thank you in turn, but bearing in mind that I did no more than remarking on a startlingly idiotic principle in passing instead of doing any actual work on the subject, I feel that I deserved a lot less. But far be it from me to complain when complimented! All the best, JonRichfield (talk) 05:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I appreciated your input. It was very well said. Be sure to watch the page and add follow up comment as you see fit. I'm sure we've not heard the last of it. SW3 5DL (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Vulgar Slang
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Vulgar Slang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Albert Einstein
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Albert Einstein. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chris McDaniel
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Chris McDaniel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ta-Nehisi Coates
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ta-Nehisi Coates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Padmanabhaswamy Temple
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Padmanabhaswamy Temple. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Anthony Brooks
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John Anthony Brooks. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Navarre-geo-stub
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Navarre-geo-stub. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles R. Pellegrino
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charles R. Pellegrino. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Disco Orchestration AfD Debate
Hi. Thanks for your contribution to the above debate. I certainly agree that the article contains substantial amounts of original research, but I felt that your suggestion that it was a WP:HOAX was probably a little unfair. From personal knowledge I can confirm that a great deal of what's included in the article as written is true, and where I don't have personal knowledge the claims are largely consistent with what little critical opinion there is on this subject. The problem, as you mentioned, is the lack of references. I'm expecting the article to be deleted, and will probably recommend that course of action myself, but I feel that describing the article as BS was less than fair. Thanks. RomanSpa (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * On a separate matter, I noticed your petition, and have signed it. Anything that improves communication is always welcome! RomanSpa (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for signing that petition. I didn't have any issues as some editors encountered. It would have been nice to have a heads up on that one. On the article, I spent some time looking into that. There is no such thing as 'disco orchestration' and there is no evidence via sound recordings and/or performances by any of the listed city symphony orchestras that any of the orchestra conductors ever dipped their batons in a single disco song, let alone create 'disco orchestration.' I did add a comment for the closing admin. It is truly a hoax and should be speedily deleted. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

DRV - IFFHS best clubs of the 20th century
As you participated in the AFD, you might be interested in the DRV. GiantSnowman 17:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've commented. My view is still delete per WP:NOTSTATS. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Operation Defensive Shield
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Operation Defensive Shield. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oscar López Rivera
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Oscar López Rivera. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:UK Independence Party
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:UK Independence Party. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dave Brat
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dave Brat. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human scale
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Human scale. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 22:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israelis in India
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Israelis in India. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Shock Doctrine
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Shock Doctrine. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elizabeth II
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth II. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

UKIP talk page
Thank you for thanking me lol --Jacksoncw (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! SW3 5DL (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Autism spectrum
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Autism spectrum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Thompson (Aryan Brotherhood)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Thompson (Aryan Brotherhood). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Daniel Amen
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Daniel Amen. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nizari
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nizari. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:USRepSuccessionBox
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:USRepSuccessionBox. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2014 Spring, Texas shooting
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Spring, Texas shooting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation accident task force
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Aviation accident task force. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cory Gardner
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cory Gardner. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:LeBron James
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:LeBron James. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bharatiya Janata Party. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Hello SW3, I see that you reverted an edit by an IP today where they added a hatnote for South African Revenue Service. Actually this edit does seem to me constructive as matters stand; oddly enough, Sars redirects to the disambig page, but SARS (all caps) redirects straight to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Would you consider either restoring the IP's edit, or reviewing how the redirections work? Noyster  (talk),  18:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. I've redirected SARS to the disambig page. The IP's first edit here seemed questionable to me so I'd no idea what he might be up to. The virus pages are easily vandalized with subtle inappropriate additions/deletions as many editors on vandal patrol are unable to recognize the edit as vandalism. Thanks again. SW3 5DL (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Galicia (Eastern Europe)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Galicia (Eastern Europe). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Distinguish
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Distinguish. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

talk page ebola
hi theres a kinda sorta vote for the article title, under Spain,if you think its a good idea.thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Ozzie10aaaa, Hey Ozzie, thanks. I'll check it out. Are you interested in editing any of the new articles like 2014 Ebola virus cases in the United States? You always come up with great links to info. It'd be great if you could be there, too. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 21:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * thank you.i would be more than happy to, I believe you have been excellent as an editor,thank you again.--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Ozzie10aaaa Thanks, Ozzie. I think you're an excellent editor, too. Pick any one or all of them. They all needs lots of new editors who are enthusiastic. This thing is only going to get bigger. The air travel makes it so. :( Thanks again, Ozzie. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

I agree.thank you, once more--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussions, :-)
Hi SW3 5DL I tried a bit to understand the conflict we have between the authors. But this is really difficult, I thing it started when authors said, "No do not do this edit." And then the discussion started not to focus on content and arguments but on the contributors. "Do this maverick", "You should have locked into a dictionary", You should read first before you start editing, ... Then one personal statement causes the next. I myself was frustated when I mentioned an interesting idea, and a reply on the talk page was, "We should not take this article serious, a 3rd grade could have done it better". I see only one solution, make only comments focussed on content. Stop saying, what is believed, that the other person is. We do not know. This is an anonymous medium. And the moderators where already activated, so I propose to keep calm and wait how they decide. My opinion is, that they are very reluctant to delete the new pages. So I said to me, let me start to work on the new pages. But if they are deleted, I will write about Guinea on the main article. When I see how much is written on Sierra Leone, I would say, the next split at least to a Combined Guinea/Sierra Leone/Liberia Page is not far. And contrary to some authors, Guinea appears to me quite different from Liberia. And reminding myself of the letter to the editor, I just mentioned on this page. We are helthy and at least in the moment we are save (Unless we live in this countries) --Malanoqa (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Malanoqa, Oui, je suis d'accord. Nous devrions nous prononcer uniquement sur lest travaux. Oui, nous sommes en bonne sante. Nous avons de la chance. Je n'ai pas dit correctment? SW3 5DL (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * SW3 5DL Peut etre je ne comprend vrais, mais ta premiere language est francais? Le collaboration on the article d'Ebola au Guinée va comonce tout a l'heure. Je souhaite ca marche bien. On va dispute tout le part qui sont general et pas specific pour Guinée. Excuse moi les multiple fault de language, mais c'est mon niveau maintenant. A bon continuation,--Malanoqa (talk) 18:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Malanoqa, Je parle l'anglais en premier. Je parle allemand, aussi. Je ne parle pas bien le français. J'ai lu bien le français. Nous pouvons travailler sur l'article de Guinée. Vous pouvez parler français là-bas. Je vais vous comprendre. Cela rendra le travail aller plus vite. Oui? S'il vous plaît pardonnez-moi si mes mots ne sont pas en bonne et due forme. Nous pouvons travailler ensemble sur l'article de Guinée. Vous pouvez parler français là-bas. Votre travail sera plus rapide. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! SW3 5DL (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Something interesting for you to look at...
check this post out.... Gremlinsa (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Happy Halloween!

Hello SW3 5DL: Thanks for all of your enthusiasm and knowledge to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy Halloween!   –  Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

thanks, and whatsmore, thank you for making article editing (Ebola) great. thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ozzie, I appreciate you saying that. :) SW3 5DL (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Halloween to you too!
Hope you enjoy the holiday. Thanks for the greetings. They're much appreciated. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

 * Thank you, Ozzie. I appreciate it. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays!
Thank you. Best wishes to you and yours for a happy holiday season and a prosperous new year! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:12, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Current disaster
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Current disaster. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Caitlyn Jenner
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Caitlyn Jenner. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Volleyball at the 2014 Asian Games
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volleyball at the 2014 Asian Games. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Climate change denial
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Climate change denial. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase I/RfC
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase I/RfC. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 11:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, FWiW Bzuk. Merry Christmas and a happy and healthy New Year to you as well! SW3 5DL (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

 * This card was designed by User:Samtar


 * Thank you, <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:black">Buster Seven  . Merry Christmas to you, too, and a very happy New Year to you and yours. SW3 5DL (talk) 20:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
Thanks very much, both for the kind words and the lovely notice. Best wishes to you and yours as well, and happy editing into 2016! -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 21:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you, have a happy one! SW3 5DL (talk) 16:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 in American television
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 in American television. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vyborg
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vyborg. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:English Democrats
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:English Democrats. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Resting bitch face
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Resting bitch face. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox religious biography
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox religious biography. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corporal punishment
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corporal punishment. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Solovyov (philosopher)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Solovyov (philosopher). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Psychology of sexual monogamy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Psychology of sexual monogamy. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:European Graduate School
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:European Graduate School. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brick (song)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brick (song). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Plushophilia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Plushophilia. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!
From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Bzuk. That's very thoughtful, and to you as well. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:51, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you,, I would say the very same can be said of you. SW3 5DL (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Randy Quaid
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zapad-2017 exercise
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zapad-2017 exercise. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ned Kelly
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ned Kelly. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Student financial aid
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Student financial aid. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Recent years
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Recent years. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Abbreviations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Abbreviations. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Bundy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Bundy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Editor review
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Editor review. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Exodus
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Exodus. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European Union
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject European Union. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

"tis the season...."
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0 0.5em; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello SW3 5DL: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   22:06, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff June 2018
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;"> <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"> June 2018

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> FROM THE EDITOR

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">The Right Stuff Returns

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story) - <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> ARBITRATION REPORT

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including and the notorious.

Editors who faced Enforcement action include (no action),  (three month topic ban ARBAPDS),  (no action) and  (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story)

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> IN THE MEDIA

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Breitbart Versus Wikipedia

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story) - <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> DISCUSSION REPORT

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

There are several open discussions at the Project:

Recently closed discussions include Anti-abortion movements which was not renamed, and an RFC at Trump–Russia dossier. (Discuss this story)
 * There is an RFC regarding Liberty University and its relationship to President Trump; see discussion
 * Activist and commentator Avi Yemini is listed at AFD; see discussion

Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff: July 2018
<div style="font-family:Wedding Text, Linotext, Old English Text MT, serif; font-size:58px; line-height:69px; padding-bottom:6px;"> <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:100%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"> July 2018

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> DISCUSSION REPORT

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion. Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story) - <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> ARTICLES REPORT

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> RECENT RESEARCH

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Research About AN/I

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by 

Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey. The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:


 * 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
 * "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
 * "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here. (Discuss this story)

Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Peace Dove Christmas
Happy Holidays. &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   20:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Haven't seen you around in a while
Just stumbled across your page again and realized I hadn't seen you around. Hope everything is okay! --valereee (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi ! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over three years.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:


 * 1) Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
 * 2) Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
 * 3) Paste  underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
 * 4) Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)