User talk:SWBPAUSEWATCH

Welcome!
Hello, SWBPAUSEWATCH, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:The Braithwaite Particle Trap &, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 24.211.70.219 (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Braithwaite Particle Trap & Field Density Rectifier


A tag has been placed on Draft:The Braithwaite Particle Trap & Field Density Rectifier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 24.211.70.219 (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Braithwaite Particle Trap & Field Density Rectifier


A tag has been placed on Draft:The Braithwaite Particle Trap & Field Density Rectifier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 24.211.70.219 (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The BPT Power Source & Field Density Rectifier


A tag has been placed on Draft:The BPT Power Source & Field Density Rectifier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 24.211.70.219 (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Problems with your editing

 * 1) If you really believe that the stuff you have written is valid, and if you can manage to get it generally recognised and written about in reliable sources, then someone can, and very likely will, write a Wikipedia article about it. However, Wikipedia is not for publicising original ideas, no matter how valid or invalid, that have not yet received substantial coverage in reliable published sources.
 * 2) I see that you have written "This submission is to promote ownership and safety measures", but that is an example of what Wikipedia is not for: Wikipedia policy does not allow editing for any kind of promotion.
 * 3) You should not be writing about your own work: see the guideline on conflict of interest to see why. JBW (talk) 18:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Their user page says that they have a COI. 24.211.70.219 (talk) 19:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Whenever something is invented, it's not entirely about the person. It's also about the parts of the invention. Wikipedia asked for references. They got that from me. In the introduction to submit an article, I guess it all meant that Wikipedia is Loring people to admit they are writing about themself. I did a test to see if Wikipedia has become like those people that hog domain names and I found out yes. "7jrdtyuuh65fcch42ff" is "Conflict of Interest". SWBPAUSEWATCH (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Whenever something is invented, it's not entirely about the person. It's also about the parts of the invention. Wikipedia asked for references. They got that from me. In the introductions to submit an article, I guess it all meant that Wikipedia is Loring people to admit they are writing about themselves. I did a test to see if Wikipedia has become like people who create domain names to make people pay extra money for what they want. I found out Wikipedia has become like that; "fejnbytfg65fh" as a title is a "Conflict of Interest". SWBPAUSEWATCH (talk) 23:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Science Without Equations (October 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Science Without Equations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Science_Without_Equations Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qcne&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Science_Without_Equations reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Qcne  (talk)  11:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. At first I gave you the benefit of the doubt for some highly dubious editing, but it is now beyond any doubt whatsoever. You have posted absolute gibberish which you must have known was gibberish (perhaps created with the aid of an AI tool) and you have given false "references" which either you knew did not support the information to which they were attached or else you knew they were just created by AI and made no attempt to check them. JBW (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I thought the AIs do a good job according to what most folks say. It's all gibberish to me. I don't think you comprehend the gibberish of AI, therefore don't brag about anything. Else, I don't know what you are talking about. I copied and pasted my information from other rejected submissions from you people. How long do you think it took to copy MY OWN STUFF, paste and alter a few titles of the paragraphs, and resubmit them for inappropriate people to read? It took minutes. If you feel something happened, you should get the right authority to contact me. The things you are doing will just get you into trouble and get Wikipedia sued. Do you think you can accuse me of plagiarism? Maybe you should tell your superviserw--whom I am sure you don't report to, you just keep rejecting people and sending them rude remarks. You sound like a tyrant. You should check yourself with your superiors before you wreck yourself--to change the HTML codes that people used for years to copy their source codes to notepad.exe, save it to be altered whenever, and embed it whenever, to your desire in source codes, and break tradition as well as Wikipedia. One single article, gone or ruined. I am a quick learner, it might have simply been an ease. What's the mystery? One of you blocked me and erased my work while I was writing it. That seems to be an invasion of privacy. You are blocking people, erasing their stuff, and calling them names. I believe your system advisers note 'try again' or 'resubmit'. Why are people still letting you work for Wikipedia? If I hadn't gotten some advice from one of my friends this morning concerning why Wikipedia has several nonsensical articles, from what I was told about how "people pay to publish their [garbage]", I wouldn't have made up my mind that Wikipedia gets paid to publish jargon garbage full of cited names and weird scientific terms that are false. For example:
 * 1. False Vacuum.
 * a. My research shows me that whatever vacuum the author refers to, even if it was a bit denser in
 * outer space and the universe, things might turn out fine. It's easier to achieve physics in a denser
 * atmosphere. And if the vacuum goes below 1e-17 Ω, the entire universe will cease to exist,
 * either from a massive implosion or a fiery death from intense amplitudes in current charges. The
 * author didn't even use the Big Bang Theory as a reference.
 * b. You people don't know anything about connecting Cited sources. In that sense, I am sure my presentations :      were meaningful. I am sure that those who go against meaningful things are stupid indeed. I am glad I :       :       didn't put equations in my articles, especially the questionable ones. You thieves see enough from :       :       unsuspecting victims. What are you going to block? You fools erased it all. What else did I publish? :       :       Good luck with all your garage Wikipedia articles.
 * 2. Superinsulator.
 * a. The article went batty at the end.
 * a. The article went batty at the end.


 * There are articles with References Cited to nothing, phony links or removed sources. Who published most of your garbage articles. If my stuff was a problem for anybody except for phonies like the latter and former-- hey, do you have that article where the DOE did studies on high resistivity and found out the force between the barrier is caused by an EMF? --and them, there is no doubt it would be known when I get into trouble. Until then, you are just creating an isolated incident that is meaningless to the rest of humanity. When you are home relaxing, don't think about men, go get a woman to make you back off from garbage to say to people when you come back to work. Or go see a therapist.
 * Wikipedia needs a makeover. And you are another form of proof. SWBPAUSEWATCH (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I do believe we need the right tools on Wikipedia to block you. You should consider that becoming part of your future on Wikipedia to stay silent.
 * Do you suppose this is how death row works? It sounds like plagiarism:
 * "Self-requested blocks
 * Shortcuts
 * WP:SELFBLOCK
 * WP:BLOCKME [...]
 * Sometimes, people request that their account be blocked, for example to enforce a wikibreak. Such requests are typically declined, but there is a category of administrators who will consider such requests.
 * As an alternative to requesting a self-block, users may use the Wikibreak Enforcer, a user script that can prevent a user from logging in.".
 * Let's see how "Self-requested blocks" work. You should never block anyone again. It's insanity and therefore all forms of writing are garbage. SWBPAUSEWATCH (talk) 16:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you are clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia; the post immediately above this would alone be enough to show that, even without considering the rest of your editing hsitory. Also, Wikipedia policy is that as long as an editor is contemplating legal action, or has indicated an intention to do so and not retracted it, they may not edit, and may be blocked to prevent them from doing so. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. JBW (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Yep. You need some therapy. SWBPAUSEWATCH (talk) 23:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * All of you have a particular set of skills to band together and act like idiots. Your blocks are just to cover up your mistreatment of people. I wonder which one of you stole my usual username "Pausewatch" that I use for internet places? It seems that people keep doing more and more nonsense. I just wonder who you think you are fooling by covering you tracks. The only reason I don't report you all to your bosses who seem not to care about you by telling you where to go shove yourselves by luring you to mess with people that did nothing to you is that's an appropriate punishment. The way I see it is you are all nuts by creating havoc since you lost track of some person or people, you messed with on some "Tuesday". Get this though, use a VPN, create a new account, and come back. Guys who go home thinking about what men will do next. I changed my original logon information because I wondered what sort of nonsense you people are up to, 'looking for vandals'. You are nuts. I could go to a social media network, announce what you people do, get a million people to post their finest works and let you reject them then and accuse them of nonsense, and boom! File lawsuits people. You all did a lot of nonsense for the last few days. "Wikipedia! Your submissions are like the victims who signed on with the wrong stockbrokers. Robbed! And accused of wrongdoing!". What is wrong with you fools believing that I was submitting the good stuff? SWBPAUSEWATCH (talk) 23:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)