User talk:SYDNEYres

Official portraits
Because for living people, Wikipedia only allows free images. If an image has not been released in to the public domain, it cannot be used. Thanks. Timeshift (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clearing it up --SYDNEYres (talk) 07:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

lulz... clearly this account was always a sockpuppet based on the infoboxes added and the unusually explicit edit comment upon adding them, and asking me a silly question. I wonder how many more times this person will re-create accounts before giving up and realising now that we know, we'll be catching them out each and every time? :) Timeshift (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Look how many edits i have done and still have lots to offer especially writing demographics on NSW electoral districs, I have turned over a new leaf, please consider that fact. --SYDNEYres (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * It is true that I am KAPITALIST88 = AusRight = SYDNEYres = Conservative in 2010 but that was only because I knew that anyone would not believe me that I could turn over a new leaf. --SYDNEYres (talk) 06:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * What part of indefinate ban don't you understand? Timeshift (talk) 07:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The fact that I was blocked from my own talk page so that I could not contest the ban --SYDNEYres (talk) 07:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * You've been instructed on ways to contest it without using your talk page. I think even that is too generous considering your actions. You don't deserve to ever return IMHO. Timeshift (talk) 07:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * IMHO I HAVE changed and can provide a valuable service to Wikipedia and you have to admit when you didn't know that I was the former KAPITALIST88 instead some new guy called SYDNEYres who edited A LOT of NSW electoral districts and added a good paragraph on demographics on 2 of them you were like pretty good, but when you realised that i was the former KAPITALIST88 you immediately went into attack mode and started sledging me without even taking into consideration that I have rehabilitated --SYDNEYres (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I was like pretty good? What are you on? I wholeheartedly endorse the below unblock decline and any future such instances. Timeshift (talk) 08:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

FYI for admins
I appear to have received an email from this user via the wikipedia email feature, and it goes as follows: Hello, you and I have seemed to be at loggerheads for a while now and since I was blocked it has made me realise that I need this website and it needs me because I believe I have so much to offer to Wikipedia about Australian politics and because I like this site. My sheer desperation on not being able to edit obvious errors on Australian political articles had enraged me so I created a new account  called "SYDNEYres" and in less than 2 days I made 65 contributions to articles and I knew that it was wrong and against Wikipedia's guidelines concerning sockpuppetry but I believe that I have rehabilitated and am not a threat to security on Wikipedia anymore, thanks.

Uh-huh. Timeshift (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)


 * This may be relevant if/when this user makes a request from his/her original acount; it's not relevant for any requests made from this one. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)