User talk:S (usurped also)/Archive Jul 2007

Bot request
Can you follow up on your comments made on the Bot request page, with the section Bot_requests.

I don't mind if you say no, but I'd just like a reply. If you do say no, I will go through and do it manually.  SpecialWindler   talk  08:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at user's talk page. --S up? 13:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Replied at WP:BOTREQ  SpecialWindler   talk  11:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Bot?!
Hi, I don't use bot for adding templates. I use script.--OsamaK 12:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied there. --S up? 13:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

inadvertantly removing colons
This edit of yours removed a colon from the category reference, placing the page in the category. That seems wrong to me. Also, do you know where this move was discussed? I've looked and can't find it. I think it's a perfectly fine move but am curious as to the discussion, thanks. ++Lar: t/c 03:24, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Lar, first of all let me thank you for fixing my mistake. I don't really know how I managed to screw that one up since I actually remember doublechecking those edits. I guess my typically espresso-infused brain must have been craving for more caffeine. ;) Anyway, thanks for picking up my slack. I'm afraid there wasn't much of a discussion though. Category:Administrators open to recall was speedily renamed to Category:Wikipedian administrators open to recall (please see this listing on WP:CFDS). There has also been some discussion at the category's talk page. In fact, the edit you mention was part of an attempt to fix some redlinks created by the move (which, in turn, was done by my bot) before the redirect was in place. --S up? 10:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Cheers for that info. If I spot any others, I'll fix them. I had let you know because I thought it was bot changed rather than manual and that you might need an algorithm tweak. ++Lar: t/c 14:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Anytime. :) And thanks for letting me know. S up? 14:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. --ST47 Talk 13:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)
The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Seedbot edit summary glitch
Hey there. I just noticed that the edit summary from Seedbot when it removed categories is wrong here, here, here and here, as the only category removed in each instance was "Category:Eponymous albums". It is correct for example here and notably here though. This leads me to believe the bot uses the incorrect edit summary when the category is included as " 15:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi PEJL, thank you very much for bringing that to my attention - I really appreciate it. That does indeed look like a bug (kind of a weird one, too). I'll definitely look into it. Cheers S up? 18:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Wrong date given in edit summary from Seedbot
On recategorising pages from Category:Bus companies to Category:Bus operating companies, which is in the CfD log for July 5, I notice that the CfD link in the edit summary instead points to the log for July 4. Is this a fault in the bot itself? Or was there a human error in the parameters it received? Just curious... Quackdave 18:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Responded at user's talk page. --S up? 18:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Robert Palmer – Blue Eyed Soul
Hello there. I noticed that a bot had removed one reference to 'blue eyed soul' that I added to the Robert Palmer page but left the one in info box on the right. I'm afraid I'm still learning the ropes here and I couldn't quite follow the 'Blue Eyed Soul'-discussion page. Should I remove the second reference? Cheers. Doozy88 20:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at user's talk page. --S up? 21:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I find Wikipedia fascinating but there's so much to learn that it can be a little overwhelming :-). Doozy88 21:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Ana Ivanovic
Yeah I read the info now about POV and I see what ya mean. You and I both know its the truth but expecting the other readers to agree is a tough thing. What I done is went back and rewrote the thing but I changed the words. Everyone agrees that something has to be written about her beauty, otherwise they wouldn't know an important fact. Cheers bud. Sideway Star 21:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Please vote for whether Gun Nut deserves deletion or not
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gun_Nut --BillyTFried 23:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Sup!


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * Well, I embarrassingly got tags working again. Any news on ye olde feature request (when you return)? Enjoy your flight :p  Giggy  UCP 10:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I hacked up your wonderful tags script
Thanks for your tags script! I made some changes to a copy in my userspace and thought you might be interested. Cheers, Iknowyourider (t c) 18:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

bot request
You may remember doing the Category:Queensland Rugby League State of Origin players, tagging every page with that category.

Well it appears I forgot the other team, so I put a request on the WP:BOTREQ page, to do the same thing except for this page New South Wales state rugby league team players for this category Category:New South Wales Rugby League State of Origin players.

Thanks  SpecialWindler   talk  03:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at user's talk page and at WP:BOTREQ. --S up? 14:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Jeff Greenfield
Hi, how are you doing? You seem to have removed the "Jewish American journalists" cat for Badagnani 20:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied to at user's talk page. --S up? 14:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I'm unfortunately all too familiar with the "I'm just a janitor" response/defense and find it just as disgusting as when any other category deleter rampages through categories without fixing them properly (one by one, replacing with the proper upper-level remaining categories) for future users. I've not once encountered an individual doing what you're doing who admitted an error or actually followed through and corrected him/herself. It's not a question of "being a janitor" but doing what is right. I find it excrable that you apparently find it just fine to perform such "janitorial" work while neglecting the actual cleanup, done properly, to ensure maximum usability by editors in the future. I have the best interests of our encyclopedia and its users foremost in my mind and am far from convinced (from the lack of accountability of users such as yourself) that it is also the case for yourself. I now have to go through, by hand, and replace remaining Jewish categories for hundreds, if not thousands of articles when your bot could just as easily have done this in the first place. I've had to do this before, and been through the same song and dance with the category deleter: "Well, I wasn't specifically told to do that, and, by the way, it would be so hard to go in and examine all the articles one by one, doing it by hand..." The irony is, I'll have to do that now! It's a question of "right" and "wrong," and you're in the wrong, no matter what kind of "janitorial" defense you might make. You really do have to think about our users, and the fact that what you're doing is fixing one thing while breaking another. Badagnani 01:03, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied there. -- S up? 11:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

BOT and NYT
Your bot is making changes that break working links of 2006 and adding links to 2007 that do not exist like July 29. --Drappel 22:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * & replied to at user's talk page. --S up? 22:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for sorting that, I was worried the BOT would go further, by the way it is doing a good job fixing the past ones that were missed. --Drappel 22:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Picture
Thanks for the comment on the images I uploaded. →Antonio Edward (Allah) 22:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

That's kind
Thanks for the kind message. Best wishes, RobertG &#9836; talk 16:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Your BOT
S, I noticed that the category for Category:Battles and operations of the 2003 Iraq conflict changed to Category:Battles of the 2003 Iraq conflict. I do not agree with renaming this category. There are many operations that are not battles. Some are humanitarian missions to provide food, medicine or services to the Iraqi people, some are classifications (such as the ones for Canadian, British or australian participation) and some are simple searches or security operations were no or limited fighting occured. I notice that someone ran a bot that is changing the category for the new name and I recommend we stop it before the true battles are lost in an unrecognizable blur.--Kumioko 00:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied at user's talk page. S up? 18:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism query
Hello S. I'd like a quick word of advice. I've been working on the Klaus Kleinfeld page and someone keeps vandalising it. I don't want to get into a tit-for-tat edit war so I thouhgt I'd ask an expert. What do you think I should do? Cheers. Doozy88 19:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Replied there. S up? 20:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I thought it better to ask an expert rather than jump in with both feet :) . I've come across a couple of edit conflicts and it seems they can deteriorate pretty rapidly. Cheers again. Doozy88 20:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Native American flaut?
Indeed. Makes sense, so I'll list it for unrenaming. Thanks for letting me know. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your generous offer. Yes, if you can have your bot put them back, that would be just magic! Thanks again! Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 13:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Project Fanboy
Hi, I was wondering if you might be interested in helping me with an article I'm working on for the comic book website Project Fanboy

I've created the article here on my sandbox and was wondering if you'd be so kind as to give it a look and let me know what you think. (whether the site is notable enough for an article or not yet) All the best, Millennium Cowboy (talk) 15:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)