User talk:SaLaPi22/sandbox

I really like the picture!

The first sentence of the Lead Section is a little dense and could be more clear. The last sentence of the first paragraph is a little opinion heavy and made more neutral. Easy fixes probably.

Good edit to Analyze section to make it more accessible.

Also good edit to the Integrate Section, but add source(s) for it?

You have started on the environment section, which is great since it is so sparse. Maybe continue with editing the rest of those sections in the Environment part?

Also maybe clarify what exactly the Environment Section is since I am not entirely sure what that means in this context. It seems to be the steps of processing digital information for digital pathology use.

The View subsection under the Environment section has an example, which I found helpful/interesting. Maybe you can add examples to other parts of the article to make it more thorough and understandable; to apply what is being said to a real situation.

I would also continue linking to outside articles and making the technical jargon used more accessible since this topic seems very technical.

If you have any information that is strong and relevant enough to create a new section, I would say go ahead! Because it seems the current sections are good, but maybe not comprehensive enough. I don't know about the topic but it feels like this article is missing something. For example, the machines/programs that do this or the most common pathologies using this technique etc. Flash Flood Warning (talk) 16:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)