User talk:Saad1008

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John Layfield has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: John Layfield was changed by Saad1008 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958556 on 2015-05-29T16:21:57+00:00.

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tom Welling has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tom Welling was changed by Saad1008 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92074 on 2015-07-06T01:40:51+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at John Layfield. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 01:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

August 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Marine has been reverted. Your edit here to The Marine was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lse8brh0aX8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to LaMelo Ball. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Bagumba (talk) 06:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Devin Booker
Hi Saad1008 and welcome to Wikipedia. I have removed your addition to Devin Booker because it was all speculative rumours. Please do not add contentious rumours to biography of living people. Every reference you posted says one person is claiming this to be true and it is all rumours. Wikipedia isn't meant to be a gossip magazine or a diary. Please leave contentious rumours off Wikipedia. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Lonzo Ball. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''Specifically per MOS:CONTRACTION, the use of contractions is discouraged. Thanks.'' —Bagumba (talk) 01:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kawhi Leonard. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 17:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Saad, I've done some small stylistic changes. I would appreciate it if you would not criticize other good faith editors. I too am a fan of Kawhi Leonard and his persona. Bellagio99 (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Bubba Ray Dudley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. StaticVapor message me!   05:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lonzo Ball, you may be blocked from editing. Merely having a tattoo with a verse doesnt mean one is necessarily a Christian. —Bagumba (talk) 16:51, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kawhi Leonard. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 18:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Triple H. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kawhi Leonard. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 05:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Cena. StaticVapor message me!   17:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

, what do you make of this page full of BLP-related warnings? I'm dropping another one below--maybe it's time to consider a more serious measure than a short block. Drmies (talk) 04:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , it is clear that, despite numerous warnings over an extended period, this editor actually focuses on adding material to BLPs (mostly irrelevant bordering on the salacious) essentially to the exclusion of all else. When someone has already been blocked twice for edit warring, and had numerous warnings for BLP violations and use of inappropriate references (including some direction on how to improve their editing)...and they've done all that with only 245 edits...I'm not entirely certain they're getting the point. I think this should be considered an absolutely final warning, and the next BLP violation after this timestamp should be considered the last straw and result in an indefinite block.  I could easily be persuaded that either a time-limited or indefinite block would be appropriate now.   Risker (talk) 04:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , you'll never guess what the editor did a few hours after we left these messages here. Drmies (talk) 00:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 00:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)