User talk:Saawcdfge

Recent edit to Amaras Monastery
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Amaras Monastery, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:05, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Amaras Monastery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  17:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Widr
hello I am so sorry for all I am new user in wiki and I don't know some rules and I didn't read your messages before 1 or 2 minutes ago I saw it and I understood everything don't worry if you don't want me to change something I won't but I want to say something about article that you wrote false things for example you wrote Amaras is armenian monastery and was building by armenian architecture but it is absolutely wrong Amaras is medieval Albanian monastery and it was building by medieval albanian architecture and historical facts demonstrate it I know you got info from some websites but all of them are wrong I am so sad for everything but your information is not true so that why I wanted to change it
 * Notifying Widr  Nott Nott  talk &#124;contrib 17:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping, NottNott. Saawcdfge, please read all the messages you received before the block. I understand that you are new, but that is not an excuse to edit disruptively. After the block expires, please try to be more collaborative, and don't hesitate to ask other editors for guidance if you think you need it. You can also go to the article's talk page and explain the concerns you have. Thank you. Widr (talk) 18:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)