User talk:Sabah786

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Provocation (legal) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Provocation (legal) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Provocation (legal). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Schnitzel MannGreek. 22:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

If you want to see how the page looks as you are editing it, try using the "show preview" button instead the "save page". That way, you can work on the page an submit it all at once, without it being deleted or accidentally considered vandalism. Thanks, and happy editing! --Minkus (talk) 22:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Provocation (legal). Schnitzel MannGreek. 22:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Nakon 22:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Provocation (legal)
I have reverted your change again as you just copied and pasted most of the article at Provocation in English law into Provocation (legal). Please do not do that. I strongly suggest that you take the time to read Wikipedia's Help section and discuss any issues that you have with the article on the talk page before you make another change. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop removing the lead section with content from other websites. If you continue to do so, I will reblock you for disruptive editing. -- 17:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Quantpole (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Quantpole. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. &rarr;  Dylan 620  (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 19:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Account blocked
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.